Concerns have been raised over blood sports lobbying taking place at Holyrood as MSPs begin taking evidence on legislation to regulate grouse shooting.
Campaigners have criticised the “propaganda” being on show at the Scottish Parliament as politicians consider evidence on the SNP Government’s Wildlife Management and Muirburn Bill.
The legislation would change rules around how people can capture and kill certain wild birds such as grouse and regulate muirburn - the controlled burning of heather and other plants for land management purposes.
Blood sports lobbying campaign, the Gift of Grouse, under the banner of Scottish Land and Estates, has been granted the right to host a stall in the Scottish Parliament this week.
The three-day exhibition comes despite the Wildlife Management and Muirburn Bill starting stage one evidence sessions this week.
In 2019 when the last Climate Bill was passing through Holyrood, some organisations were not allowed to host events on climate targets specifically over concerns it would allow MSPs to be lobbied over live legislations outside committee evidence sessions.
Read more: Revealed: SNP ministers who have met with oil giant behind Rosebank
The Scottish Parliament Corporate Body’s (SPCB) policy used to prohibit member-sponsored events that potentially related to live legislation, but that rule was removed in updated guidance in 2020.
A leaflet being handed out to MSPs claims that the Gift of Grouse initiative “offers a voice to all those involved in moorland management and highlights its benefits for biodiversity, carbon sequestration, the economy and rural communities”.
The leaflet claims that the licensing schemes proposed in the Scottish Government’s bill “have three fatal flaws which are of major concern to land managers”.
The material claims NatureScot’s power over licences gives the public body “a huge amount of discretion” which it says “would not provide land managers with the certainty that is required to invest long-term in moorland management”.
It adds: “If passed, the bill would render moorland management unviable, putting jobs and investment at risk, as well as our ability to protect crucial carbon stores and upland biodiversity.
Read more: 'Dereliction of duty': Greens accused of shunning Scottish Land and Estates conference
“We urge the Scottish Government to work with stakeholder organisations to make this bill proportionate and workable.”
The leaflet also contains a quote from Scottish Tory net zero spokesperson, Liam Kerr, in which he claims the legislation “must provide an outcome that delivers in the best interests of wildlife, the environment, the rural economy and sustainability of our rural communities”.
A press release issued by the campaigners claims that the legislation being discussed means “there was no better time to raise awareness of potential impacts of the bill”.
Ross Ewing, director of moorland at Scottish Land and Estates, said: “This exhibition allows us to engage in informal discussions with politicians to help raise our concerns about the bill, whilst stressing the importance of the moorland management sector for the rural economy, jobs, communities, wildlife conservation, carbon sequestration and biodiversity.”
Since November last year, Scottish Land and Estates has lobbied MSPs 13 times, including two lobbying meetings each with Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton and SNP MSP Jim Fairlie, as well as twice with SNP minister Mairi McAllan.
The organisation has met with members of the Tories, SNP, Labour and the Greens, according to lobbying records – with the majority of interactions related to the bill.
Read more: Greens minister Lorna Slater lobbied by industry 48 hours before delaying deposit return scheme
Mr Fairlie, who sponsored the stall, said it was “important to give colleagues that may be less familiar and less experienced with the issues involved the opportunity to engage with a diverse group of stakeholders representing Scottish Land and Estates”.
He added: “I encourage my colleagues to check out their stall, to takeaway a pot of heather and other goodies and to learn about the effect of muirburn on heather, and wish every success for this week’s exhibition.”
Speaking to The Herald, PETA’s vice president of programmes Elisa Allen, said: “The hunting lobby knows its days are numbered and is clutching at straws.
“Sensible MSPs aren’t likely to be swayed by its propaganda and will instead listen to the wishes of their constituents – the vast majority of whom are opposed to gunning down animals for ‘sport’ and see grouse shooting for what it is: a violent perversion that hurts and kills beautiful birds and destroys precious ecosystems.
“The sooner this cruel pastime is banned, the better.”
A spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said: "It raises questions when a group like this is using our parliament to promote grouse shooting and lobby MSPs at the same time as we are considering legislation to licence grouse moors to address the illegal killing of birds of prey.
"It is of course a decision for the Scottish Parliament's Corporate Body, but we were surprised and disappointed to see these bloodsports being promoted in our garden lobby.
"The Scotland we want to see is one that looks after all of our wildlife and protects their welfare. We look forward to the day when these so-called sports can be ended for good."
The Scottish Parliament’s events and exhibition team reminds organisers, and others, of their legal duties in regards the lobbying register.
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: “Following a review by the SPCB in January 2020, and the creation of the lobbying register, the nature of members’ sponsored events and exhibitions are no longer impacted by any live legislation being considered by Parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel