ANAS Sarwar has backed Sir Keir Starmer’s plans to block all new oil and gas developments, with Scottish Labour saying they are only committed to “existing fields.”
That puts them at odds with industry bosses and trade unions in the North East, who have warned that it could cost thousands of jobs.
It's understood some Labour politicians in Aberdeen are also uneasy with the party's new position.
According to reports over the weekend, Sir Keir is due to announce the ban next month when he outlines his “national mission” to cut the UK’s reliance on fossil fuels.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer oil and gas ban plan blasted by sector and unions
David Whitehouse, the Chief Executive of trade body, Offshore Energies UK described it as “no way to treat” the 200,000 workers in the industry, 90,000 of who work in Scotland.
He said Sir Keir had promised to “engage meaningfully” with the sector, but had not yet done so.
Ryan Crighton, from Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said the plan was not grounded in reality.
While Gary Smith, from the GMB Union — one of Labour’s biggest donors — said the new policy would leave the UK more reliant on imports from Russia.
The Scottish Conservatives said Sir Keir’s approach was “nothing short of a gut punch to the industry and tens of thousands of Scots who work in it.”
Their Shadow energy secretary, Liam Kerr, urged Mr Sarwar and his party to clarify their position.
Responding, a Scottish Labour spokesperson would only say that they were committed to existing licences.
She said: “Labour will not impose a cliff edge end to oil and gas production while we transform the UK into a clean energy superpower – existing licences will continue and using existing wells sensibly is baked into our plans.
“Labour is committed to a just transition that works for all of our communities – lowering bills for good and creating tens of thousands of skilled, long-term jobs in Scotland and across the UK.”
Mr Kerr said: “This response shows Scottish Labour are right behind Keir Starmer’s desire to abandon Scotland’s oil and gas sector – which would devastate communities in the North East, raise prices for consumers and have serious negative environmental consequences.
“They talk about wanting to avoid a cliff edge but, as anyone that understands the sector knows, that is exactly what they would create by blocking any new licences being granted, particularly with many existing fields nearing the end of their lifespan.”
Reports of the plan first emerged in yesterday’s Sunday Times, with a Labour source telling the paper: “We are against the granting of new licences for oil and gas in the North Sea.
“They will do nothing to cut bills, as the Tories have acknowledged.
“They undermine our energy security and would drive a coach and horse through our climate targets.
“But Labour would continue to use existing oil and gas wells over the coming decades and manage them sustainably as we transform the UK into a clean energy superpower.”
It follows on from comments made by Sir Keir at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this year, when he said his government would not invest in oil and gas.
In their draft energy strategy, published in January, the Scottish Government said there “should be a presumption against new exploration for oil and gas” but stopped short of calling for an end to new exploration.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has backed new oil and gas exploration, with the North Sea Transition Authority recently holding a licensing round for oil and gas exploration projects.
READ MORE: Ferguson Marine: Ministers accused of ferry cash state aid 'cover up'
Speaking to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland, Mr Whitehouse said the industry supported the transition away from oil and gas, but that what Labour was proposing was not a transition.
“Today, 75 per cent of our energy comes from oil and gas. We're very fortunate that we've got a sector that produces about 50% of that. So fundamentally, we're providing a lot of the energy required today.
“But every single credible scenario for reducing emissions has a period of time in the next number of years where we will continue to use oil and gas.”
He said the existing fields being explored would “decline quickly” and without new licensing, the UK’s energy security would be undermined,
“If we have no further investment, you will see that import gap increasing. We're estimating that by the end of the decade, the UK will be importing over 80% of its oil and gas needs.
“That means we're taking oil and gas from countries which do not have the same commitment to climate change.”
“Today, the oil and gas sector employs over 200,000 people up and down the country. Yes, there will be jobs in the future but they're not there today,” he added.
“If we undermine the oil and gas sector today we undermine the key supply chain companies that not only service the oil and gas sector but are needed to deliver on the renewables.
“If we undermine this sector today, what that will mean is we will import the energy transition. So the jobs that should be being created here in Scotland, here up and down the UK will not be created here, we will simply import them to the detriment of the UK and to the detriment of Scotland.”
Writing in the Times, Mr Crighton said: “Our politicians consistently forget the ‘net’ in net zero. We will still need oil and gas beyond 2050. And if we are to do that in the most efficient way possible, that needs new North Sea fields.”
READ MORE: Tory MSP suggests Scotland's DRS could go ahead with glass included
Mr Smith, general secretary of the GMB, said there was “no point strangling the industry.”
“We need to work with the industry to encourage investment in the green technologies of the future," he told the Financial Times.
“It would be self-defeating not to maximise extraction from our own oil and gas, and that’s going to be a difficult debate but it’s one we’ll have to face down."
“There’s ethics involved - are we going to keep funding these regimes in the Middle East and the likes of Russia, or do we take responsibility for our own carbon and create jobs and investment here?”
The proposal was welcomed by campaigners, Just Stop Oil. "We will hold Labour to this promise, and continue to push our genocidal government to drop their indefensible policy of new oil and gas," they tweeted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel