KEITH Brown has defended his party’s decision to hold an independence conference in Dundee on the same day as an All Under One Banner rally in Stirling.
The pro-independence group last week accused the SNP of treating supporters with contempt after creating the clash on June 24.
They had invited Humza Yousaf to speak at the rally, saying that Yes voters expected the leader of the SNP to take part.
However, the First Minister turned it down on Friday and said another “senior member of the SNP team” would attend instead.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf could yet fight general election as 'de facto' referendum
On Saturday, Mr Brown - the SNP’s depute leader - announced the members-only independence convention would also be on June 24, creating a diary clash.
The meeting was supposed to have been held in March, but was delayed after Nicola Sturgeon’s shock resignation.
In a tweet, All Under One Banner said: “We wrote to Humza inviting him to speak at Stirling 24 June, and received a weird reply – swiftly followed by news that he’s chosen to clash with the national demonstration by holding an SNP conference on the same day.
“Why? Reactionary and contemptuous. De facto anti-YES behaviour.”
We wrote to Humza inviting him to speak at Stirling 24 June, and received a weird reply- swiftly followed by news that he's chosen to clash with the National demonstration by holding a SNP conference on the same day. Why? Reactionary and contemptuous. De facto anti-YES behaviour.
— All Under One Banner (@AUOBNOW) May 21, 2023
Speaking to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland, Mr Brown said: “I think it’s unfortunate when parts of the Yes movement have that kind of go at each other, to be honest.
“I’ve attended any number of AUOB marches, have spoken at many of them indeed, and in this case, this is the last week before the summer recess, this is the date which the SNP need to have its discussion on.”
Mr Brown went on to say there should be “different activities” held across the Yes movement, adding: “There’s nothing wrong with the SNP, its members, demanding and having the opportunity to discuss a strategy for the way forward for independence and the next Westminster election.”
The former minister added that the SNP was “perfectly entitled” to discuss its strategy on independence, saying: “We’re not going to achieve independence without a wider Yes movement, just as the wider Yes movement won’t achieve it without the SNP.”
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn hints at supporting Labour without Indyref2 deal
Mr Brown was also asked about the possibility of using the next general election as a “de facto referendum.”
Over the weekend, Jamie Hepburn, the Minister for Independence, confirmed the idea, first floated by Ms Sturgeon last year as a way around a Westminster block, would be “on the table” at the June meeting.
The former first minister’s exit was, in part, because she did not want to push through with the plan.
The candidates to replace her all distanced themselves from it during the leadership contest.
Many of the party's MPs privately warned that the idea of claiming half the votes cast plus one as a mandate for independence would unworkable as the UK Government would simply refuse to acknowledge a win.
Mr Brown said: “That has to be put to the UK Government, why do they want to deny democracy?”
He added: “It’s the UK Government that is acting peculiarly, wrongly and in my view like a rogue state.
“We are trying to find a democratic route through to express the democratic wishes of the people of Scotland, as they’ve endorsed in repeated elections.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel