A Labour government could expand the UK voting franchise to match those of the Scottish Parliament as a key frontbencher insisted the party under Keir Starmer is a “classic Labour offer”.
Shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds said plans to explnd the voting franchise for Westminster elections is “something we will look at, amid reports Labour plans to allow settled migrants and 16 and 17-year-olds to vote.
In Scottish Parliament and council elections, 16 and 17-year-olds can vote, as well as all foreign nationals with leave to remain, including all those granted refugee status.
Read more: Analysis: New SNP blueprint lines up Labour as main target
Mr Reynolds also attempted to bat away criticism of his party leader, after Sir Keir was accused of moving Labour even further to the right.
Addressing the changes to voting rights for House of Commons elections, the Labour frontbencher stressed such moves are “not the final plans for the Labour manifesto”.
He added: “I don’t think any changes to how the British state works, how democracy works, should ever be considered through any kind of party political lens.”
Mr Reynolds told Sky News’s Sophy Ridge On Sunday: “I think there are arguments for expanding the franchise, it’s not an area I directly deal with in the shadow cabinet.
“I’m not going to give a definitive answer on that, but I think we should always be seeking to involve as many people as possible in our democracy…
Read more: Starmer rules out SNP deal over independence 'fundamental difference'
“It’s something we will look at, but some of the reports, I’ve got to stress they’re not the final plans for the Labour manifesto.”
Mr Reynolds said his party is “always looking at ways to strengthen our democracy”, when quizzed about plans for changes to the voting system.
He told Sky News: “Some of the speculation that’s been in the press about Labour policy actually relates to our policy-making process, it’s not our manifesto, it’s not a statement of party policy, but it’s how we go about doing that.
“We’ve got a process where people put in their submissions, they’re deliberated on, they’re voted upon, so this is not a statement of policy yet, but of course we’re always looking at ways to strengthen our democracy, to involve as many people (as) possible in that, and there’ll be an element of that, reform of how this country operates, how power is shared, in the Labour manifesto, that’s for sure.”
He argued the Conservative Party “seems quite demoralised and as ever full of internal conflicts and battles”.
The Labour MP added: “I don’t accept the case that we’re not putting forward specific policies.”
Mr Reynolds said Sir Keir Starmer’s description of his party’s reforms as Clause Four “on steroids” related to the “level of ambition” of Labour’s “policy platform”.
Read more: Anas Sarwar refuses to back Glasgow Labour leader ahead of challenge
The comments have been jumped on by opponents, particularly the SNP, who claim it shows Labour is moving to the right under Sir Keir.
Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme, Mr Reynolds said: “It means that if you look at the scale of the challenge an incoming Labour government would have, it is, I would argue, bigger than any other point in British history.
“We’ve had an economy that hasn’t performed as it should have for 13 years, we’ve got public services where, let’s be frank, are there any public services today working better than 13 years ago when the Conservatives came to power? No.
“So the scale of what we’ve got to do is not only have the policy platform that meets that, have the courage to change the Labour Party to meet that, that is what Clause Four fundamentally was about. I think that is what Keir has done so far.
“We know there’s more to do, but Keir is making clear, yes we see the challenge is very big, but don’t underestimate our determination to meet that challenge.”
Mr Reynolds insisted his party under Sir Keir is embodying a “classic Labour offer”.
He told the BBC: “I think it is incumbent on any political party that’s had a defeat as significant as 2019, to look at itself and say we’re going to have to attract some voters back who didn’t vote for us last time.
“I want people who voted Conservative last time to look again at the Labour Party, look at their own priorities and say actually yes, it is Labour who better represent that.
“That doesn’t mean we’re not embodying what I think is a classic Labour offer, I think that is fundamentally what Keir Starmer is about. A stronger set of employment rights, a better industrial policy, making the economy work for working people, rebuilding the NHS.
“There’ll be limitations, of course, on any incoming Labour government there’ll be limited funds, there’ll be priorities we have to make.”
Meanwhile, former Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable suggested to The Observer it would be “highly improbable” that his party would enter a coalition with Labour, after the experience of its “very unbalanced” arrangement with the Conservatives from 2010 to 2015 – but did not rule out other ways.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel