A TORY Cabinet minister has insisted that voter ID was a “thoroughly good thing” despite multiple reports of people being turned away from polling stations in yesterday’s English local elections.
The SNP has said they fear the new laws “could pose a serious threat to the upcoming general election.”
The Electoral Commission has confirmed that they are aware of people being unable to cast their vote because they didn’t have the right documents.
READ MORE: Local elections: Tories suffer losses in Sunak's first electoral test
More than 8,000 council seats were up for grabs yesterday and, for the first time, under a controversial new law brought in by the UK Government, every voter needed to have some form of photographic ID.
Valid ID included passports, driving licences, older or disabled person's bus passes, and Oyster 60+ cards.
Shortly after the polls closed, a spokesperson for the Commission said that while the elections were “well run” they knew that the need for ID “posed a greater challenge for some groups in society, and that some people were regrettably unable to vote today as a result.”
Electoral Commission chairman John Pullinger told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Firstly we do need to gather data before we get a really proper picture of the impact of voter ID, but I was out and about yesterday and I saw people being turned away and we know some people were unable to cast their vote because they didn’t have the right documents.
“Everyone who has the right vote should be able to cast their vote and we need to get underneath the challenges that they have faced.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: 'I didn't have new job lined up when I quit as FM'
The policy is strongly opposed by the SNP, Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party but the Government claims it is necessary to tackle electoral fraud.
Speaking to Sky News on Thursday evening, Northern Ireland minister Chris Heaton-Harris defended the new rules. He said similar measures have been in place in Northern Ireland for 20 years.
He said: “It’s a thoroughly good thing, it means that you can be completely sure that your elections are well tested and safe.
“And I don’t think, actually, considering this is a relatively big change for our politics in England that there’s been any of the big problems that people warned might come from this.
“I think most people have just taken to it as you would expect them to.”
Tom Brake of Unlock Democracy, who is leading a coalition of groups against the policy including the Electoral Reform Society, said: “Today has been a dark day for British democracy
“Reports from all over the country confirm our very worst fears of the impact of the disastrous policy which has been made worse by the shambolic way it has been introduced.”
READ MORE: OPINION: The Coronation: a happy distraction from our dysfunctional politics
The SNP Cabinet Office spokesperson Kirsty Blackman said voter ID was an attempt by Rishi Sunak’s party to “cling on longer in government.”
“It is deeply troubling that voters were turned away from polling stations and unable to express their democratic wishes all because they were not carrying ID.
“One person being denied their right to vote is one too many and this could pose a serious threat to the upcoming general election. In fact, the next real test of these Tory laws could come even sooner if we are to have a by-election in Rutherglen and Hamilton West.
“It seems the Tory plan to exclude people from voting has worked as certain groups have not been able to cast their vote. The Tories are barring people from taking part in democracy, in a desperate attempt to cling on longer in government.
“We will continue to oppose the policy of voter ID and we will not introduce it for elections the Scottish Parliament controls – Holyrood and local council elections.
"Until independence we are tied to this broken and increasingly corrupt Westminster system.
"I would urge everyone to get an acceptable form of voter ID before the next general election, so we can show the Tories the door.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel