RISHI Sunak has been accused of “dither and delay” after failing to make a decision about whether to sack deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab over alleged bullying.
The PM received the long-awaited report into Mr Raab’s conduct by Adam Tolley KC around 1130am, and had promised to consider the findings “swiftly”.
However, amid reports that Mr Raab has refused to resign as he does not believe he has broken the ministerial code, Mr Sunak has yet to decide whether to sack him.
It is understood a decision will not be made until Friday at the earliest.
Mr Sunak, who said he would bring “integrity and accountability” to No10 after replacing Liz Truss, said he had “full confidence in his close ally before receiving the report.
Mr Raab, who is also the justice secretary, was one of Mr Sunak’s most loyal supporters for the Tory leadership last year, and his exit would be a huge blow to the PM.
If Mr Sunak ruled Mr Raab did not break the ministerial code, the worst outcome for both men would be if the details of his conduct created such a stink, that Mr Raab ended up going regardless, undermining Mr Sunak’s authority and reputation.
Mr Raab was investigated over eight formal complaints about his behaviour as foreign secretary, Brexit secretary and during the first of his two stints as Justice Secretary.
He has always denied bullying staff and maintained he “behaved professionally”, while accepting he has a forthright manner.
Ahead of the report being sent to No10, officials briefed the media that the five-month probe’s findings made “grim” reading for Mr Raab, and that he was “toast”.
However ITV Political Editor Robert Peston said that after reading the report himself, Mr Raab concluded it did not show he breached the ministerial code, and he would not quit.
Downing Street said Mr Sunak was “carefully considering the findings of the report before coming to a judgment”.
Liberal Democrat chief whip Wendy Chamberlain said: “People will be fed up with this dither and delay from Rishi Sunak.
“It feels like almost every week there is an issue with sleaze and scandal where Rishi Sunak is either implicated in himself or too weak to get to grips with it.
“People are crying out for a Government that will just get on with tackling the issues that matter, not focused on saving their own skin.”
Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said: “While the prime minister dithers and delays, trying to summon up the guts to sack his own deputy, working people are battling the worst cost of living crisis for a generation.”
The Prime Minister is the ultimate arbiter of the ministerial code, although he could consult his ethics tsar Sir Laurie Magnus before delivering his verdict on Mr Raab.
Sir Laurie had not been appointed as the independent adviser on ministers’ interests when the investigation into Mr Raab was launched in November.
The Financial Times reported one person involved in the process calling the review of Mr Raab’s conduct “devastating”.
The Guardian also said senior Ministry of Justice officials could quit if Mr Raab was cleared.
A decision not to punish him would be “demoralising” for staff, source told the paper.
Mr Raab has insisted he believes “heart and soul” that he is not a bully and defended his “forthright” approach to his work. The minister funded his own legal team to defend against the allegations, it emerged on Wednesday.
The declaration in the heavily delayed register of ministerial interests came despite taxpayers footing an estimated £222,000 bill for former prime minister Boris Johnson’s legal fees in the partygate inquiry into whether he lied to MPs.
In the register, Mr Raab’s entry notes read: “The minister has engaged lawyers at his own expense in relation to the investigation being conducted by Adam Tolley KC.”
Mr Raab remained at work on Thursday, responding to Crown Prosecution Service statistics on rape cases.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel