BEFORE he was infamous, Tony Blair was considered a bit of a softie.
When he won the Labour leadership in 1994, he was 41 and his party’s youngest leader.
His fresh, wide-eyed features saw him nicknamed ‘Bambi’ in the contest.
He was too naive for the job, said critics. The Tories would flatten him.
The Daily Mail ran the headline: “Where is the beef in Bambi? He’s young and he’s decent. But is there any evidence Tony Blair can run a party, let alone the country?”
But then John Major’s Tories collapsed into a self-made pit of sleaze, and Mr Blair wasn’t seen as a skittish lightweight anymore, but a potent threat. Out went Bambi and in came Beelzebub.
Ahead of the 1997 election, the Conservatives stopped patronising the Labour leader and started demonising him. Literally.
The Tories’ pet ad agency, M&C Saatchi, created the ‘demon eyes’ campaign.
📝 Sign up for our Unspun newsletter and enjoy exclusive opinion and analysis from some of Scotland's best political writers and commentators. Click here to sign up 👈
It showed a picture of a smiling Mr Blair with the strip containing his eyes torn away to reveal a pair of infernal red peepers beneath. Clearly, a great evil lurked therein.
“New Labour, New Danger,” ran the slogan. Party political broadcasts showed the same eyes peering out of a gap in a large pair of curtains, just like the ones they hang in hell.
It was wildly popular – among those who liked it.
An ad industry magazine named it their campaign of the year, claiming it had hit a nerve about Mr Blair, as well as generating £5 million of publicity for a £125,000 outlay.
Voters, however, had other ideas. The campaign of the advert of the year didn’t cut it.
The Tories lost more than half their seats in 1997. Labour won by a landslide.
Besides the tide of history flowing against Mr Major’s lot, the ad was also a bad fit for its target. For many electors, Mr Blair was still akin to Bambi.
This was six years before Iraq. The image and the slogan didn’t gel.
There’s an echo of that error in Labour’s new attack on Rishi Sunak.
“Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison?” asks an online ad with a picture of the PM. “Rishi Sunak doesn’t.”
It goes on: “Under the Tories, 4500 adults convicted of sexually assaulting children under 16 served no prison time”. Labour, says the ad, would “lock up dangerous child abusers”.
Released four weeks ahead of the English local elections and with an eye to the general election, it has caused a right old stink. It was meant to.
Even if ‘demon eyes’ failed to stop Mr Blair, the controversy meant heightened publicity, and in that respect Labour’s ad has been successful, despite problems with...
...want to read the full article? Sign up for free to the Unspun newsletter and receive it directly to your inbox every weekday night at 7pm. Click here 👈
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel