THE SNP’s President has warned the row over the party’s secret membership figures will “aid our enemies”.
Former Cabinet Secretary Michael Russell said he was “disgusted” at the attacks on SNP staff over the issue.
Writing on Twitter this morning, he also defended the SNP’s National Secretary, Lorna Finn, over the handling of the party’s frequently chaotic leadership contest.
He said: “As SNP President I have told the National Secretary I support publishing membership figures.
“I also have full confidence in her & the external verification & count. I am disgusted by the abuse directed at SNP staff by individuals who damage our cause & aid our enemies.”
The Tories said it was "a telling and depressing insight" into how the SNP viewed those who disagreed with them.
Health Secretary Humza Yousaf later distanced himself from the remark, saying the party had opponents, not enemies.
His intervention comes as the party’s ruling body, the National Executive Committee (NEC), prepares to meet online to reverse its previous decision over the membership numbers.
The group originally decided to release the voting figures - from which the party’s overall membership could be calculated - after the two-week ballot closed on March 27.
However after complaints from the candidates about the lack of transparency, the NEC will hold an unscheduled meeting and agree to release the figures today.
THe party’s membership was just over 25,000 when the independence referendum of 2014 was held, then surged after the No vote, peaking at around 125,000 in 2019.
However in recent years it has fallen, with the last published figure 103,884 at the end of December 2021.
Weekend press reports suggest it may have tumbled below 80,000, an embarrassing fall for a party which once projected the membership number on a giant screen at its conferences.
The NEC has previously been forced to reverse its decision to exclude the media from the party's hustings.
Finance Secretary Kate Forbes and former minister Ash Regan yesterday released a joint statement voicing their unhappiness at the conduct of the election.
MSP Michelle Thomson, Ms Forbes’s campaign manager, also demanded “a robust third party auditor” to examine the ballot process and vote tally.
READ MORE: SNP leadership contest in chaos as Forbes question integrity of vote
She said the company running the ballot, Mi-Voice, was not truly independent, but acted on behalf of SNP HQ, which is run by Nicola Sturgeon’s husband, CEO Peter Murrell.
She warned trust was being undermined in SNP HQ.
Ms Sturgeon’s closest political ally, Shona Robison, and her closest special adviser, Liz Lloyd, are both backing health secretary Humza Yousaf to be SNP leader, and there are concerns that SNP HQ cannot therefore be wholly impartial.
Mr Yousaf tweeted on Thursday: “I have confidence in the process that uses an external third party company, a process we have used for many years.
“I am up for challenge & reform of the party, but let’s not indulge in baseless smears.”
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland this morning, deputy First Minister John Swinney, who is backing Mr Yousaf, said he had 100 per confidence in the election process.
He said: “I don’t understand half of these comments. The process is being conducted by an independent ballot services company, that is an independent organisation. They have got a professional reputation to deliver ballot services effectively and without question.
“My experience, and I have got a lot of experience of elections within the SNP. I have been a candidate in many of them, I ran many of them as the party secretary over many years.
“I have also seen this process we are going through just now operating in the election of previous deputy leaders of the party which we have undertaken in recent years and nobody, nobody, has raised an issue about the authority of those processes.
“They have been completely straightforward, efficient, independently organised processes, and this is exactly the same. So I don’t know what this is all about.”
Asked if he was satisfied the election was being run “entirely properly”, he said: “100%.”
Scottish Conservative chairman Craig Hoy said: “Mike Russell has let the mask slip. This is a telling and depressing insight into how the SNP view those who don’t agree with them.
“This is the legacy of Nicola Sturgeon’s divisive style of politics: an opponent or even a sceptic is branded an 'enemy'.
“The irony is that having pitted Scot against Scot for years – with their independence obsession – now the SNP are bitterly split themselves, and most of the ‘enemies’ are fellow party members in rival camps.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel