The candidates to succeed Nicola Sturgeon have said the price of SNP support under their leadership for a minority Labour government after the next election would be another referendum on independence.
Labour could find itself in need of SNP votes at the next election – predicted to come some time in 2024 – but Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly ruled out a deal with the nationalists.
He told party members at the Scottish Labour conference last month there would be no pact with the SNP.
Speaking during a Sky News debate in the hours after voting for the next SNP leader officially opened, all three candidates said they would extract another vote to put Sir Keir in Downing Street.
READ MORE: SNP race sliding into 'paranoia and mistrust' amid vote rigging row
“Give us the power to hold a referendum, because our democracy and our voice should not be denied any longer,” Health Secretary Humza Yousaf said.
Finance Secretary Kate Forbes said she would work with the party on an issue-by-issue basis, particularly in the fight against poverty, adding: “For anything more, (my price) has got to be another referendum.”
Ms Forbes said she would not “trade poverty for independence”, but said “any support would have to be contingent on another referendum”.
Former minister Ash Regan said: “At the moment, we’re obviously in a political stalemate where Westminster are denying the voice of Scotland being expressed, so a Section 30 order would be an obvious way to go there.”
The Edinburgh debate, the third of its kind so far in the leadership race, was less aggressive than previous affairs, where the candidates – in particular Ms Forbes and Mr Yousaf – repeatedly clashed.
🏴 "What would be your price of supporting or propping up a Labour minority government?"
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 13, 2023
Finally, @BethRigby asks the three candidates how they approach the SNP's role as potential "kingmaker" of the next government
📱https://t.co/5xGmiZZPBm
📺Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/I9aMuJaaMH
Elsewhere, Ms Forbes’ views on social issues were further probed after the early days of her campaign focused largely on her saying she would not have voted for equal marriage in 2014.
Asked if she would bring in a complete ban on conversion therapy – including the voluntary use of the practice – Ms Forbes stopped short of saying she would, but described it as “abhorrent”.
“My commitment to you is to look carefully at (banning voluntary conversion therapy),” she said.
“What I’m not going to do, because I don’t think any government has done that yet, it is to precede the normal process of legislation.”
She added: “I think people should be allowed to live freely as they choose and I don’t think there should be conversion therapy in existence in Scotland.”
Asked if a gay man should be allowed to seek conversion therapy to change his sexuality, Ms Forbes said: “Well, it’s his choice, but I do not think we should allow conversion therapy.”
The Finance Secretary added: “My position on this is that people should be allowed to live as they choose in a free, tolerant society, and I think the conversion therapy Bill should reflect that.”
Ms Forbes also expressed support for the views of author JK Rowling in her criticism of gender self-identification reforms.
Ms Rowling has been a fervent critic of the changes, which were blocked by the UK Government in January after being passed by MSPs from all parties the previous month.
READ MORE: Forbes insists independence process after Yes vote won't take 'many many years'
She has also levelled criticism directly at Ms Sturgeon, posting a picture of herself in a T-shirt branding her a “destroyer of women’s rights”.
Ms Forbes agreed, when asked, that the author was a national treasure, as well as describing her as brave.
When asked if she supported Ms Rowling’s views on gender reforms, she said: “I don’t disagree with her.”
While Ms Regan struggled on the detail of her currency plan, saying she “can’t give the full details” until it is fully devised by an independence commission she would form on the first day of her leadership.
🏴 The three SNP leadership candidates answer @BethRigby's quick fire questions across a range of topics
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 13, 2023
🔵 Advice from Sturgeon or Salmond
🔵 J. K. Rowling
🔵The role of the BBC director general
🔵 The next UK PM
📱https://t.co/5xGmiZZPBm
📺Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/XjsWtv4Ig3
“This is a credible plan, I can’t give you the full details of how it would work yet, because obviously, we’ve got to go through that process,” she said.
Challenged by host Beth Rigby on the creation of other institutions on top of a central bank, Ms Regan – who said she was the “only hope” for the independence cause – added: “I don’t have the full detail on this at the moment because this is going to be the stuff that will be looked into by senior economists and bankers.
“As first minister, you’re surrounded by civil servants, you have top advisers to be able to advise you on this.”
She went on to say that creating a detailed manifesto in a week as a result of the leadership campaign would be “an impossibility”.
Ballots in the SNP leadership contest opened on Monday, just hours before the debate took place.
A new poll for Sky News by YouGov released on the same day also suggested the Scottish public felt all three candidates would not be as good at leading the country as Ms Sturgeon.
Ms Forbes and Mr Yousaf also clashed over their support in the country.
Ms Forbes said: “On the polling, I don’t think that’s where you’re particularly strong.
“I have not only got net positive ratings, I have actually got higher net positive ratings than either of the opposition leaders. That is what matters for an election winner.”
Mr Yousaf replied: “I accept we have to reach out to No voters but it is so important that we don’t lose our own supporters, and the way we do that is by not abandoning our progressive agenda, isn’t that right?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel