SNP leadership hopeful Humza Yousaf has told the party’s most vociferous internal critic people do not vote for divided parties, as he urged her to be “respectful”.
Joanna Cherry has repeatedly railed against the party’s hierarchy, most notable on her strong opposition to gender reforms, but has more recently hit out at the position of chief executive Peter Murrell – who is married to Nicola Sturgeon.
This week, the Edinburgh South West MP – who has announced her backing for Ash Regan in the race to succeed Nicola Sturgeon – said the “party machine” was working to elect the Health Secretary.
READ MORE: Yousaf criticises Cherry over sharing of 'abhorrent' Twitter post
Speaking to the PA news agency, Mr Yousaf said he did support her remaining as an SNP MP, adding: “I would say to Joanna Cherry that it’s really important, of course, that we speak up about principles, but we do so in a very respectful manner.”
He added: “And what I would say is that people don’t vote for divided parties or divided movements.
“(She’s) absolutely right to raise concerns you’ve got, but I absolutely think you have to raise them in a way that is respectful and that’s the type of leadership that I want to see.”
Irregular use of emails, secondment of party employees & an endless parade of payroll support. I don’t make claims without evidence. Anyone who thinks the answer to the party & Govt problems is more of the same is not paying attention. https://t.co/OR4Hc2Ft8x
— Joanna Cherry KC (@joannaccherry) March 7, 2023
When pushed on Ms Cherry’s comments about the support from the SNP hierarchy for his candidacy, Mr Yousaf intimated there may be a political motive behind them.
“It’s also a leadership contest,” he said.
“You just take these things on the chin as you go.
“I don’t really entertain conspiracy theories, I never really have.”
The question of discipline within the SNP has come to the fore in recent months more than it has since the party took power in 2007, starting with the rebellion of nine MSPs against the party’s gender reform proposals.
The Bill – which would be blocked by the UK Government – passed by 86 votes to 39 in December, with the SNP group whipping its MSPs to vote in favour.
It is not clear what – if any – disciplinary action was taken against the nine rebels, but Mr Yousaf said he backed the decision to whip MSPs in favour of the Bill, adding he was not in favour of removing the whip for those who voted against.
“I think collegiate leadership is what’s needed to heal those divisions, and there are divisions in the party, there’s no point in pretending otherwise,” he said.
“My view has always been that you create the biggest tent as possible.”
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry claims SNP 'party machine' backing Humza Yousaf
Even if MSPs vote against the whip, Mr Yousaf said, the party has a duty to ensure they do not feel they are “cast out as pariahs to live their whole political life on the back benches”.
But he said it was “important” that the SNP whipped members to vote in favour of the gender reforms.
“For me, this was an issue where we make the process ever so slightly easier for a very marginalised group of people, so I think it’s right that we had whipped the party,” he said.
SNP MSPs, he said, were elected on a manifesto in 2021 which pledged to reform gender recognition legislation, but the controversial principle of self identification – where a person can change their gender without a medical diagnosis – was not included in the party’s election platform.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel