JOANNA Cherry has hit out at the unfairness of the SNP’s leadership contest, saying the candidates had been “bounced” into the race to replace Nicola Sturgeon and were forced to come up with their policy packages 'on the hoof'.
The MP, who is backing Ash Regan in the battle, also claimed the “party machine” was backing Humza Yousaf.
It comes as one of the Health Secretary’s backers was sanctioned by the SNP’s National Secretary for using her party email in a bid to drum up support.
READ MORE: The secret ministerial register: a conviction, conflicts and whisky
Emma Harper messaged members in the South of Scotland detailing why Mr Yousaf was the “best person” to be First Minister.
Under the rules of the contest, no member is allowed to use a party email “to seek to influence the votes of members in the election.”
Last week a poll of 515 SNP members put Mr Yousaf ahead of rivals, with 31 per cent saying they would back him compated to 25% supporting Kate Forbes.
Just 11% said they would give their first preference to Ms Regan.
Speaking to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland, Ms Cherry said it would be wrong to write off the ex-minister’s bid.
“She's making progress and I've heard a number of people say they've been switched on to her campaign after listening to her properly at the hustings.”
The MP said Ms Rgan had shown “great courage and leadership” last year when she resigned as community safety minister over the Gender Recognition Reform Bill.
“Ash is on the left of the party socio-economically, which is more in line with my views. And she's got a hinterland beyond politics. And she's worked in business. She's worked in PR, and she's worked in policy with the Commonweal think tank.
“And I think those are all things the party could benefit from. Also, she wants to bring the independence movement back together, and involve them in developing a strategy that will actually deliver independence.
“And she wants to address the question of the SNPs internal governance and internal party democracy.”
READ MORE: OPINION: What the Scottish nationalists shouldn’t be saying right now
Ms Cherry said all three candidates faced a “pretty major” problem.
“They've been bounced overnight into a very short campaign with no resources, no preparation, no backup team, and no facility or time to develop a policy programme.
“Now, it's no secret that the party machine is behind Humza, and not behind Kate and Ash.”
“We've already had a couple of cases of people wrongfully using the party's internal mailing system to support Humza.
“So my point is this, the party hasn't had a leadership campaign, a leadership election for nearly 20 years. This election should involve a detailed discussion of policy and strategy for the years going forward. “Most of the candidates have had no time to prepare their policy packages and are having to do so on the hoof.”
She said it was not fair on the candidates, the membership or the country.
“This is not an ideal way to be doing things, but we are where we are.”
READ MORE: Kate Forbes to target house-building as FM amid 'immense pressure'
Confirming that she would give her second preference to Ms Forbes, the Edinburgh South West said this was despite the Finance Secretary bring to to the right of her on socio-economic policy.
“I don't agree with her religious beliefs. But importantly, she hasn't given any indication that she's going to impose her religious beliefs through legislation on the rest of us. As a gay woman, if she was going to do that I couldn't give her my support.”
Ms Cherry said she was "optimistic" for the party.
The comments come ahead of tonight's leadership hustings in Dumfries.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel