“We don't want to turn the chamber into a church”
This is the response I was given by a male colleague after I raised the issue of noise as a barrier for me being able to participate in the Chamber.
This is only one example of the type of behaviour exhibited and defended by many of my - mostly male - colleagues.
No woman gets into politics by accident, regardless of our party, we have all had to work hard for it.
In some respects I was better prepared than most new MSPs. I had spent the last seven years working as a parliamentary researcher, so I knew Holyrood well.
Yet, increasingly, I have found that our chamber is being dominated by a discourse that prioritises competition, one-upmanship, and machismo over serious debate.
It is part of a culture that myself and a lot of other women MSPs have become increasingly worried about - a culture that sees mostly male colleagues feeling free to interrupt, shout down and abuse points of order for political point-scoring.
The toxicity often extends to social media, which has become far more hostile since the debates on GRR and the publication of my Bill on buffer zones. The abuse from strangers, mostly men, is one reason why I use Twitter far less than I used to.
Despite all of this, and in some ways because of it, there is a camaraderie that has developed between a lot of MSPs across different parties. Sometimes we will text each other across the chamber with congratulations on a good speech or a chiding for ‘stealing’ a question.
Our parliament has long held a reputation for its modern, progressive, and positive culture, with contrasts often drawn between our Chamber and Westminster.
We must work to preserve that reputation and that culture rather than resorting to the kind of toxic, disrespectful, and misogynistic tone that has deterred so many excellent women from getting involved in politics.
Gillian Mackay is the Scottish Green MSP for Central Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel