ALEX Salmond has dramatically intervened in the SNP leadership contest and challenged Humza Yousaf’s account of why he missed a key vote on gay marriage.
The former First Minister said his recollection was that Mr Yousaf skipped the vote because he wanted to avoid it as he was under pressure from religious groups.
"His memory may be different from mine, let's put it that way,” he told Sky News, adding that his recollection chimed with that of former health secretary Alex Neil.
The comments once again put Mr Yousaf’s credibility under the spotlight, especially as he has taken a swipe at leadership rival Kate Forbes for not supporting gay marriage.
Mr Neil, who led the same-sex marriage legislation through Holyrood, claimed last week that Mr Yousaf missed the final vote because of “pressure from the mosque”.
He said Mr Yousaf, then minister for external affairs, had deliberately arranged a ministerial meeting as “cover” for his absence.
READ MORE: Former SNP minister challenges Yousaf's gay marriage vote excuse
At the time, many muslim leaders in Scotland were deeply opposed to the law.
Although Mr Yousaf backed the legislation in principle at Stage 1 in November 2013, he was the only minister to miss the crucial Stage 3 vote in February 2014.
This was because he had himself created a diary clash 19 days in advance of the vote by arranging to meet the Pakistan Consul General at the same time.
He later said he had to discuss the case of Mohammad Asghar, a Scot with a history of mental illness, who was on death row in Pakistan for blasphemy.
However Ms Asghar was sentenced to death after Mr Yousaf arranged the meeting with the Consul, meaning he could not have known he was on death row at the time.
Mr Yousaf vehemently denied Mr Neil’s claims, and suggested they were motivated by his predecessor’s support for his rival in the SNP leadership, Kate Forbes.
Interviewed by Beth Rigby on Sky News, Mr Salmond said he learned around 10 days before the Stage 3 vote that Mr Yousaf would miss it.
The Alba party leader said: “"I've been very reluctant to get involved in this because it is an internal SNP leadership battle.
"I really don't have a dog in this race, and anything I say, you know, people will say 'he's only saying that because he's leader of Alba'.”
Pressed on whether Mr Yousaf skipped the vote due to "religious pressure", Mr Salmond said: "That's my recollection."
SKY NEWS EXCLUSIVE
— Connor Gillies (@ConnorGillies) March 2, 2023
Former FM Alex Salmond says he received call around 10 days before historic equal marriage vote saying Humza Yousaf “arranged a Govt meeting” on same day amid pressure from religious groups.
Tells @BethRigby his version is backed up by others present at time. pic.twitter.com/2oIYh2w3Mz
Asked what reason was given, Mr Salmond responded: "I didn't discuss the thing at great length. The assumption was there was pressure."
Speaking about Mr Yousaf's denial, Mr Salmond said: "His memory may be different from mine, let's put it that way.
"He seems to have a different recollection from what I do or what Alex Neil has, so be it."
Ms Rigby said: “Just to be clear, your recollection was that it was a conscience vote, but that vote was missed because of religious pressure?. That it was a vote that Mr Yousaf perhaps wanted to avoid? That's your recollection?”
Mr Salmond replied: “That’s my recollection.”
Responding to Mr Salmond's claim today, Mr Yousaf told Sky News: "Well I have to say, my recollection is very different to Alex Salmond's recollection. Alex Salmond is also, I think by any objective measure, he has of course backed other candidates in this race."
Told Mr Salmond has not backed any of the other candidates, Mr Yousaf said the former first minister had "made it pretty clear" that he does not want to see him as leader of the SNP.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf vehemently denies Alex Neil gay marriage claim
Asked if Mr Salmond was "not telling the truth", Mr Yousaf stated: "My recollection is different to Alex's. I'm not going to sling mud."
He added: "Alex Salmond will say what Alex Salmond has said. Alex Neil will say what they say. I will continue to give you my recollection of what happened, the account of what happened.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel