THE number of people on NHS waiting lists is expected to “flatline rather than fall” over the coming year, with “meaningful” decreases unlikely to occur before mid-2024.
Not the verdict of Audit Scotland in its damning report on the NHS this week, but an analysis published on February 8 by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) giving its prognosis for the health service in England.
Across the board in the UK, the pace of recovery is slow and any return to “normal” - whether that's characterised as restoring elective activity to pre-pandemic levels, or exceeding them - remains far off.
Many of the objectives set out in Scotland’s ‘NHS Recovery Plan’, first published in August 2021, and England’s ‘Elective Recovery Plan’, published in February 2022, quickly slid from ambitious to unrealistic.
READ MORE: Scot Govt told be 'be more transparent' on missed NHS Recovery targets
There are some areas where England appears to be outperforming Scotland, however.
One is around so-called “long-waiters”.
England’s recovery plan included a goal that, by July 2022, there should be no one left on elective waiting lists who had been waiting for their procedure for more than two years.
According to the IFS, this “has largely been achieved”: between February 2022 and November 2022, the number of patients with two-year waits fell from 23,300 to 1,400 - a reduction of 94 per cent.
The think tank notes that “while the number has not strictly reached zero, this should be viewed as a success for the NHS – it was never likely to completely eliminate these waits, as some of the treatment needed is very complex, and some patients may choose to wait longer.”
A secondary target - to eliminate waits of between 18 months to two years by April 2023 - “remains within reach”, albeit more challenging.
As of November 2022, there were still 47,500 patients in England in this category - up from 45,200 in February 2022.
The total number of people with waits exceeding a year, meanwhile, ballooned by 36%, from 300,000 in February 2022 to 410,000 by November 2022.
In February 2020 - before Covid - that number was just 1,845.
The maths is simple: people are being added to the lists faster than they can be removed, with “little sign” - for now - of the kind of surge in elective activity that would be required to reverse that.
So how does Scotland compare on ‘long-waiters’?
The Scottish Government set out its targets later, in July 2022, with a slower roadmap for inpatient/day case procedures that would see waits over two years eliminated for “most specialties” by the end of September 2022; 18 month waits by the end of September 2023; and year-long waits by the end of September 2024 (in England, this target applies to March 2025).
READ MORE: Private Long Covid clinic 'utterly overwhelmed' as patients told there is 'nothing on the NHS'
On Tuesday, Public Health Scotland will publish its next waiting times statistics showing the position as it stood by the end of December 2022.
However, the most up-to-date information currently available shows that by the end of September last year there were still 7,612 patients on inpatient/day case lists whose waits exceeded 104 weeks (versus 2,200 people in England for the same month).
The number of people whose waits spanned 18 months and two years stood at 9,437 - an increase of 73% on 5,445 at the end of March last year.
It is also notable that number of people in Scotland with 18-month to two year waits as of September last year was around a fifth of the 47,500 patients in the same position in England by November, despite the fact that Scotland has a tenth of the population.
When it comes to the total number of people waiting over a year for hospital procedures on the NHS, however, Scotland looks to be performing proportionately better: 35,337 by the end of September last year, compared to the 410,000 in England by November.
The fact that England seems to be making faster progress on the 18-month and two-year targets may reflect that it set more ambitious timescales for these in the first place, but it also reflects a greater use of the independent sector to help clear backlogs and a faster rollout of elective surgical hubs at a time when Scotland is still waiting for its first National Treatment Centre to open.
READ MORE: Scot Govt says A&E performance is better north of the border - but is that really true?
Both countries are flagging when it comes to efforts to ramp up elective activity to the levels they first envisioned, however.
In Scotland, 2022/23 was supposed to see an additional 27,500 inpatient and day case procedures carried out over and above pre-pandemic averages, rising to an extra 55,500 by 2025/26 - a 20% increase on pre-Covid activity.
In reality, the number of operations which took place on NHS Scotland between April and December last year – 149,836 – was 20% lower than the same nine-month period in 2019.
Yes, Omicron was a factor – but as Audit Scotland noted this week, the Scottish Government “did not undertake detailed and robust modelling to inform the anticipated increases in activity levels set out in the Recovery Plan”.
It is not clear if or when the headline goal of 55,500 extra procedures will be actually achieved, with Audit Scotland observing that a progress report published in October last year contained “no reference to these milestones” and that performance was instead compared against 2021 which “may be confusing when tracking progress against the original ambitions”.
In England, elective activity is closer to pre-pandemic levels (in February to November last year, its NHS carried out 12% fewer planned operations versus the same period in 2019) but still “clearly lagging behind the planned trajectory”.
The IFS projects that NHS England would have to be carrying out 20.9% more elective procedures by 2024/25 relative to 2019/20 to meet its backlog-clearing targets.
Achieving that would require annual growth in elective treatment volumes of 10.3% over the next two years. Given that the average in the five years prior to the pandemic was just 2.9%, the IFS considers this “highly unlikely”.
But north or south of the border, expect the goalposts to keep moving - and politicians to keep spinning the statistics.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel