HUMZA Yousaf has denied intentionally skipping the key Holyrood vote on gay marriage despite setting up a diary clash with it 19 days in advance.
The frontrunner in the SNP leadership race insisted he had missed Stage 3 of the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill in 2014 “for good reason”.
Mr Yousaf, the only SNP minister to miss the vote, also suggested the issue was being "resurrected" to undermine his leadership bid.
The Health Secretary told ITV Border that he had been meeting the Pakistan consulate over the case of a Scottish citizen on death row for blasphemy.
However the condemned man wasn’t sentenced until a week after Mr Yousaf arranged the meeting, meaning he was not on death row when it was set up.
Finance Secretary Kate Forbes this week lost the support of many colleagues when she said she would opposed the gay marriage vote if she had been an MSP at the time.
Mr Yousaf, the MSP for Glasgow Pollok, voted for the general principle of the Bill in November 2013, but missed the final Stage 3 vote on 4 February 2014.
At the time, he was the Scottish Government’s minister for external affairs, while the gay marriage vote was opposed by many Muslim leaders in Scotland.
Mr Yousaf's ministerial diary records show that on 14 January 2014, the then minister for parliamentary business Joe FitzPatrick requested that he attend the Holyrood chamber for the marriage vote on 4 February.
Two later, Mr Yousaf himself then requested a meeting with the Pakistan Consul General in Glasgow on 4 February, thereby creating a clash with the gay marriage vote.
It was only a week later, on 24 January, that Mohammad Ashgar, a 69-year-old Scot with a history of mental illness, was sentenced to death for blasphemy in Pakistan.
Asked at the time why he had been absent from the vote, Mr Yousaf wrote on Twitter: “Had ministerial engagement arranged beforehand but signed pledge, voted for stage one and v public about my (continued) support!”
Asked if his absence had been “unavoidable”, Mr Yousaf replied: “Meeting Pakistan Consul discussing Scot on death row accused under Blasphemy Law not one could/want avoid.”
Asked last night on ITV Border about missing the Stage 3l vote and whether he could have rearranged his diary to be there, he said he had missed it “for good reason”.
He said: “I was meeting the Pakistan consulate over a very important case that was a Scottish citizen in Pakistan on death row for the issue of blasphemy.
“So it was not a meeting that I felt could be avoided. But also I had stated very publicly by that point as well, very publicly, my support for equal marriage.”
Asked about his diaries showing he requested the meeting with the Pakistan Consul almost three weeks in advance of the vote, and whether he was under any pressure from his community to miss it, Mr Yousaf said: “The community knows my views.
“I won’t lie to you, there will be some difficult conversations sometimes with what you describe as ‘my community’.
“I assume you mean the Muslim community. I belong to many communities.
“But there was certainly [that], I would say even in my support for example of GRR.
“But I will explain my position because I’m confident in my position.
“My position is a very simple one. I’m a minority in this country.
“I believe that my rights don’t exist in a vacuum. If I want to advance my rights, want to advance other people’s rights, they are interdependent on each other.
“I have no problem saying to you, unequivocally, as I did in 2014, that I support equality for all.”
Pressed again on whether he had deliberately avoided the final vote on gay marriage, the Health Secretary said: “No.”
Asked after FMQs by Sky News if he had set up his diary clash to avoid the vote, Mr Yousaf said: “I’ve said already 'No'. It’s incredible that in the years that have proceeded since then than nobody has ever raised the issue.
"It seems to me somewhat convenient that it’s happening during [my] election leadership bid.
“What I would say very clearly to you is my track on equalities, anybody can see, and I’m clear, that I wasn't to continue the social progress of this government.”
Asked how it looked for him to have been the only SNP minister to have missed the vote, Mr Yousaf said: “The fact that I voted for it of course at Stage 1, the fact that I was publicly in support of it at the time, the fact that I have supported bills like the GRR, I think my track record speaks for itself.
"We are in the middle of a leadership campaign and the fact that you have resurrected this issue almost 10 years on, shows it’s probably more to do with the leadership contest than anything else.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel