JOHN Swinney has said he “profoundly disagrees” with Kate Forbes on gay marriage and SNP members need to think if someone with her views would be an “appropriate” leader.
The deputy First Minister was speaking amid calls for Ms Forbes to quit the SNP leadership race after she staked out a series of jaw-dropping moral positions yesterday.
The Skye MSP, who is a devout member of the Free Church of Scotland, said she would have not have supported gay marriage if she had been an MSP when it was passed.
She also questioned whether people should have children outside marriage and said she considered trans women to be biological men, a possible breach of SNP rules.
READ MORE: Call for Kate Forbes to quit SNP contest as row deepens
Toni Giugliano, the SNP’s policy convener, last night called on Ms Forbes to quit the race as it was damaging the party and the independence cause.
Asked about the fallout from the race, Mr Swinney told BBC Radio Scotland that the debate around Ms Forbes’ position had “absolutely nothing” to do with her faith.
He said: “I’m a man of deep Christian faith, but I don’t hold the same views as Kate has set out in the course of the last couple of days.
“I think it’s been unhelpful that the debate has been focused on the question of faith, because in my view it’s got nothing to do with faith.
“There are plenty of churches… the Church of Scotland undertakes same-sex marriage and I warmly compliment and congratulate the Church of Scotland on getting carefully to that position over some years.”
READ MORE: State-owned shipyard ordered to end dangerous working conditions
Asked if Ms Forbes should have “dialled back” and “not spoken so freely”, Mr Swinney said: “I’m not going to give advice to candidates on the airwaves about these questions.
“I think what party members have got to consider - Kate’s perfectly entitled to express her views - but party members are equally entitled to decide if someone who holds those views will be an appropriate individual to be SNP leader and first minister.
“That right and that entitlement of party members to make that judgment is made available to them if a person comes forward and sets out their views.
“So we can’t really have any complaints about the democratic airing and resolution of this question.
“If Kate wants to set out those views, with which I profoundly disagree despite being a man of deep faith, then the party membership will make their judgment about those views and whether they think those views are appropriate for someone to hold if they are leader of the SNP and first minister.”
Asked if Health Secretary Humza Yousaf had his backing, Mr Swinney said he would wait for the close of nominations on Friday before deciding about endorsing a candidate.
READ MORE: Letters - Kate Forbes needs to stand aside
Asked if he was reconsidering his own position and might stand for leader after all, he said he decided last week it was “time to open up space for other people to contribute”.
Scottish Tory chairman Craig Hoy said: “John Swinney has seriously undermined Kate Forbes, his former protege, by questioning her appropriateness to be SNP leader.
“This leadership race is turning increasingly bitter, revealing deep divisions within the SNP on everything that isn’t about breaking up the UK.
“As the SNP move further and further away from the real priorities of the Scottish people, only the Scottish Conservatives will stand up to their damaging obsession with another independence referendum and get the focus onto the issues that really matter.”
Ash Regan, who quit as a minister over the Scottish Government’s gender recognition reforms, will formally launch her campaign on Friday.
She said last night she firmly supports gay marriage.
Social security minister Ben Macpherson today ruled himself out of the contest.
Nominations in the race to replace Nicola Sturgeon close on Friday, with the winner announced around March 27.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel