EDUCATION Secretary Shirley Anne Somerville is set to block Scotland's councils from cutting teacher numbers, according to reports.
Last week it emerged that cash-strapped Glasgow City Council had drawn up plans to slash 800 teaching positions and close primary schools early on Fridays in a bid to deal with a £68 million funding black hole.
READ MORE: Sturgeon under fire after Glasgow's council considers teacher cuts
Edinburgh has said it is not actively considering a cut in teachers but that “all options” are being looked at.
Midlothian has published proposals to cut 174 teachers.
In their 2021 election manifesto, the SNP promised to increase teacher numbers by at least 3,500 before the end of the parliamentary session.
Funding has been provided to councils to fund this pledge.
According to reports in the BBC and the Times, the Scottish Government could penalise local authorities that fail to recruit more teachers.
Councils will likely oppose any attempt by ministers to direct their spending.
READ MORE: Scottish school strikes: Schools shut as teachers walk out over pay
At her press conference on Monday, the First Minister said that she respected the "autonomy of councils" but that she expected the funding allocated additional teachers "to be used for that purpose."
“We have a manifesto commitment to more teachers that will inevitably be phased over the lifetime of this parliament, and that funding was about supporting that,” she said.
Responding to the reports, Ms Somerville said: “We have very clear commitments to improve Scottish education.
“Ministers are firm in their views that Scottish education would not be improved by having fewer teachers or less time in school.”
READ MORE: Spectre of savage cuts over Scots councils' £1bn budget black hole
Stephen McCabe, the leader of Inverclyde Council's Labour group said the blame for the cuts lay with the Scottish Government.
He said: "Maybe if she didn't cut Councils' funding by £1bn we wouldn't need to cut teaching posts or any other posts for that matter. The local government funding crisis is of her making."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel