By Kathleen Nutt
Political Correspondent
CAMPAIGNERS for a four day working week with no loss of pay have criticised ministers for failing to deliver on a pilot scheme promised ahead of the Holyrood election.
Nicola Sturgeon made the commitment at the launch of the SNP's manifesto in April 2021 with the document saying her government would introduce a £10million fund “to allow companies to pilot and explore the benefits of a four-day working week”.
“Before the pandemic struck, many people were already worried about work-life balance,” she said. “We want to do more to support people to achieve a better balance and help businesses employ as many people as possible.”
The SNP leader added: “As part of that, we will establish a £10m fund to support willing companies to explore and pilot the benefits of a four-day working week.”
The SNP's manifesto said: “We will use the learning from this to consider a more general shift to a four-day working week as and when Scotland gains full control of employment rights.
“We will also identify additional employment opportunities and assess the economic impact of moving to a four-day week.
“More widely, we will support a review - in partnership with trade unions and businesses - of how working practices could and should be adapted to meet the needs of the future economy.”
However, the pilot scheme has yet to be introduced.
Joe Ryle, Director of the 4 Day Week Campaign, said: “It's extremely disappointing that the pilot hasn't got off the ground yet and another example of broken promises from politicians.
"We know that thousands of Scottish companies are interested in moving to a four-day week and there is wide support across the Scottish public.
“It's about time the Scottish Government got on with it and delivered what they promised nearly two years ago."
Mercedes Villalba, Labour MSP for North East Scotland, said: “The SNP have a habit of announcing policies that they fail to deliver on and the Scottish people are fed up with their press release politics.
“A four-day working week with no loss of pay would be transformative for Scotland and there is nothing stopping the Government from delivering this much needed pilot."
In 2021, the Spanish government launched a three-year pilot project, using £45m of EU funds for mid-size companies to offer a four-day working week to staff.
Under Jeremy Corbyn, Labour pledged during the 2019 general election campaign to deliver a four-day week within a decade. “We should work to live, not live to work,” said the then shadow chancellor, John McDonnell.
Ahead of the Holyrood election, Advice Direct Scotland urged the political parties to include a four-day work week pledge in their manifestos, saying the policy “has been shown to work”.
The charity said absenteeism had fallen by more than 75 per cent since it brought in a reduced working week, and cited a report which last year found 70 per cent of people backed a four-day week, with only 8 per cent opposed or strongly opposed to the idea.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The Scottish Government recognises the environmental, health and well-being benefits, and efficiency gains that a four-day working week could bring.
“Ministers remain committed to exploring the benefits of a four-day working week. This year’s Programme for Government restated our commitment to support research and advice to improve workplace productivity and wellbeing, including on the delivery of a four-day working week pilot.
“However, in the midst of the current economic challenges there has never been greater pressure on the public finances and demand for government support. To ensure help reaches those who need it most, we have had to make tough decisions around prioritising our commitments.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel