DOWNING Street has defended Rishi Sunak’s decision to fly to Inverness for his two-day visit to Scotland to unveil the Green Freeports.
A No 10 spokesman said the Prime Minister’s use of an RAF plane meant he had time to meet with Nicola Sturgeon in Inverness last night.
It follows criticism over his use of an RAF jet to travel from London to Leeds on Monday. Labour described that as a “show of extravagance.”
While there are regular trains between London and Inverness, they do take around eight hours, at least four times the length of a flight.
However, the £70 cost of a ticket is significantly less than the expense of an RAF jet.
It also flies in the face of the UK Government's 'Jet Zero' strategy which commits UK domestic aviation to achieving net zero emissions by 2040.
In his speech to the COP27 climate summit last year, Mr Sunak said it was "morally right to honour" the UK's promises on reducing carbon emissions.
Air travel accounts for 22% of the UK's total greenhouse gas emissions from transport, and 7% of the UK's total emissions overall.
The three-hour return trip on the RAF Dassault Falcon 900LX aircraft would result in an approximate fuel consumption of 945 gallons or about 4300 litres.
That would mean emissions of about nine tonnes of CO2.
A No 10 spokesman said: “We always take decisions on the Prime Minister’s transportation with consideration as to the best use of his time and the best use of taxpayer funding.
“In this instance, travelling up by plane allowed him to have that meeting last night with the First Minister.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel