IT was a bold move, shameless even, some might say; Keir Starmer, the arch-Remainer, who people may recall campaigned for a second Brexit referendum, appropriating the Leavers’ campaign slogan “take back control”.
With a gimlet eye on all those lovely Brexit-supporting red wall seats, the chief comrade in his opening keynote speech of 2023 said he wanted to “embrace” the Leavers’ slogan and turn it “into a solution”.
He even suggested a Take Back Control Bill, promising more devolution across the UK, as the “centrepiece” of a new Labour government’s first King’s Speech to deliver a “new Britain”. The slogan sound familiar, Tony?
Under questioning, Starmer explained: “That phrase 'take back control' was really powerful; it was like a Heineken phrasing got into people. And the more they ask themselves - do I have enough control? - the more they answer that question: no.”
The Labour leader denounced the way Westminster was run as a dysfunctional “circus,” there were too many “sticking-plaster” policies, that Whitehall hoarded too much power and so a “huge power-shift out of Westminster can transform our economy, our politics and our democracy”.
He even suggested people’s desire for taking back control witnessed in the 2016 Brexit referendum was the “same in the Scottish referendum in 2014; many of those, who voted ‘yes,’ did so for similar reasons. And it’s not an unreasonable demand.
"It’s not unreasonable for us to recognise the desire for communities to stand on their own feet. It’s what “take back control” meant. The control people want is control over their lives and their community.”
Nicola Sturgeon must have been choking on her midday tea-cake. All of these sentiments could have come joyously from her mouth; indeed, she might consider recycling some of them as the SNP’s own campaign slogans.
Yesterday, the Scottish Greens urged Anas Sarwar to reject Starmer’s line on Brexit. But he won’t. Because the Scottish Labour leader knows the most important thing is to win the General Election, preferably with a working majority, which means winning back those English red-wall seats as well as Scottish ones.
In his own keynote speech, the PM set out five pledges - minus the Prescott-style card - to halve inflation, grow the economy, lower national debt, reduce England’s NHS waiting lists and stop the small boats crossing the Channel. Apart from the first one, all were without specific timescales, leaving Sunak with wriggle-room come the election campaign.
While few Conservatives desire the upheaval of having a fourth leader in less than 12 months, there are fears the Johnsonites could seriously undermine the PM’s bid to keep the Tories in power.
Some remain bitter at Sunak over his “betrayal” of Boris Johnson, who is waiting patiently in the wings to pick up the Conservative crown should the current party leader lose the 2024 General Election, which, as things stand, seems likely.
On the day of Sunak’s big speech who should appear with what appeared to be vindictive timing but Nadine Dorries, one of the ex-PM’s Praetorian Guard, who back in summer, as her hero was ousted, came in for criticism for sharing a mocked-up Caesar-like image of Sunak stabbing Johnson in the back with a knife.
Just to sour Sunak’s big moment, the ex-Culture Secretary tweeted: “Three years of a progressive Tory government being washed down the drain. Levelling up, dumped. Social care reform, dumped. Keeping young and vulnerable people safe online, watered down. A bonfire of EU leg, not happening. Sale of C4 giving back £2b, reversed. Replaced with what?”
She added it would be it “almost impossible to face the electorate at a GE and expect voters to believe or trust our manifesto commitment”. Crikey.
Now we’re told a new Momentum-style grassroots campaign is being formed called the Conservative Democratic Organisation to give members more say in how their party is run. Its leading figures are, by sheer coincidence, all Johnson allies.
One of them, Lord Cruddas, the CDO’s President, insisted the group was not about Johnson but, rather, to change the party’s constitution so no future prime minister “could ever be coronated in the future without the members having their say; especially as Rishi was already rejected by members and they have been disenfranchised from the leadership campaign”.
If that was not destabilising enough to Sunak’s leadership, there is another group being formed called Next Generation Tories, aimed at attracting younger people to the Conservative cause. Its creator is Simon Clarke, the ex-Cabinet minister, an avowed supporter of Johnson and then Liz Truss, sacked by Sunak.
The former Levelling-Up Secretary is determined to keep her emphasis on growth at the forefront of Conservative minds. He warned: “There is a real risk with Liz’s eclipse comes the wider rejection of an entire school of Tory thinking,” adding, somewhat ominously for the PM, that a “battle for the soul of the Tory Party is underway”. Already?
It certainly doesn’t sound like harmony is breaking out; quite the opposite in fact and it appears some Conservatives already believe they have lost the election. All of which will be sweet music to Labour ears.
Sunak yesterday attended an NHS “recovery forum” to heave England’s healthcare system out of its current malaise and plan a way forward while tomorrow UK ministers will meet with unions to try to end the industrial strife on the railways just as they are about to introduce controversial legislation to limit the effects of strike action. Today, the PM will seek to charm voters in a round of TV interviews.
After the Ides of March Budget, his first electoral test will come in May when hundreds of English council seats will be contested. The PM could be forgiven for watching the results from behind the Downing St sofa.
Starmer’s theft of the Brexiteers’ powerful slogan might be regarded as brave or foolish – time will tell – but if the Labour leader wants a concise and effective message, he should look no further than the most tried-and-tested one of all: time for change.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel