Fly-tippers escape any penalty for illegally dumping their rubbish in Scotland almost 99 per cent of the time, new freedom of information data suggests.
There were 207,960 reports of rubbish being dumped between 2019/20 and 2021/22, but the Scottish Liberal Democrats said just 2,467 fines were handed out.
And the party, which obtained the data from local authorities across Scotland using freedom of information powers, said that just 45 were referred to the Procurator Fiscal.
It means just 1.2 per cent of reports resulted in a fixed penalty notice or have been referred, and now Willie Rennie, the party's communities spokesman, has called for more to be done to end Scotland's fly-tipping blight.
"We need to see local authorities using the powers at their disposal to clamp down on this disgusting behaviour and ensure that repeat offenders especially feel the full force of the law," he said.
"Littering might as well be legal under this SNP government. From remote beauty spots to busy cities, these figures show that fly-tipping is a blight on our beautiful country. Not only that but it can prove catastrophic for animals, plants and soil."
Glasgow City Council reported the highest number of incidents with 67,219 but issued just 209 fines.
The City of Edinburgh Council recorded 35,038 in the three-year period, while Fife Council logged 11,711, according to the freedom of information data.
Some councils, such as Edinburgh's, did not hold data on the number of fines handed out and others did not hold data on how many convictions were secured, if any.
But, according to the party's data, only six of the local authorities in Scotland had passed cases to the Procurator Fiscal and only East Dunbartonshire had obtained a conviction.
Mr Rennie said: "The pandemic and the bin strikes disrupted refuse collections but there is also a fundamental unfairness in the present system, which sees farmers and other owners left with the responsibility for clearing up waste which has been dumped on their properties."
He said his party wanted to see increased support for farmers and those who end up bearing the brunt of cleaning up the rubbish.
"This should use the proceeds of a new restitution order which hits offenders' pockets hard," he said.
"This could see courts able to require a contribution from offenders to a new national fund available to help victims."
A Scottish Government spokesman said it was "determined to tackle the serious environmental and economic impacts that fly-tipping causes".
"We have already announced plans to more than double fines and are also looking at the possibility of extending the use of civil penalties to enforce offences," the spokesman said.
"We will also be publishing a new Litter & Flytipping Strategy in the new year, which will set how we will tackle these issues.
"We would encourage relevant public authorities to investigate fly-tipping on public and private land and to offer assistance to private landowners where they can."
Earlier this year, Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser unveiled plans for a Member's Bill to crackdown on flytipping and to "substantially" increase the existing fixed penalty imposed from its current threshold of £200.
He said that his plans would ensure the person on whose land or property waste is dumped is not responsible in law for its removal and that instead there should be strict liability on the generator of the waste for clearing it up and paying any fines for its disposal, as is already the case in England and Wales.
The Crown Office has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel