MSPs have demanded to know why a key section of a document about the CalMac ferries scandal was withheld from them by the Scottish Government’s transport agency.
Holyrood’s public audit committee has asked Transport Scotland to supply it with the “complete version” of a letter sent by former minister Derek Mackay to an SNP MSP.
The committee has also asked the quango’s interim chief executive, Michelle Quinn, for “an explantation of the omission, at your earliest opportunity”.
It follows a row over incomplete evidence supplied to the committee by Transport Scotland on 28 October, which included a letter from Mr Mackay to Stuart McMillan in February 2015.
The committee in holding an inquiry into two CalMac ferries ordered from the Ferguson Marine yard on the Clyde in later 2015 for a fixed price of £97million.
The deal proved a disaster, leading to the yard being nationalised in 2019.
The boats - known as the Glen Sannnox and Hull 802 - are yet to be finished, but are so far £150m over budget and five years late.
It has already emerged that the state-owned ferry procurement body CMAL wanted to restart the bidding process because it had concerns about the order going to Ferguson Marine.
In particular, it was worrred about the year, then owned by one fo Nicola Sturgeon’s economic advisers, could not provide a standard industry guarantee to protect taxpayers in case the work was not completed.
However Transport Scotland, under instruction from the Government, pushed ahead, with Mr Mackay, the then minister for transport, signing off the order in October 2015.
The committee had asked Transport Scotland for any correspondence it had between the Mr Mackay and Mr McMillan, the yard’s local MSP, before the yard was made preferred bidder.
It emerged Mr McMillan had asked Mr Mackay if a builder’s refund guarantee was required for the contract to be awarded to Ferguson’s.
In an indication that ministers might not insist on one, Mr Mackay replied saying that, while CMAL’s “preference” was for refund guarantees, “it has on occasion taken alternative approaches”, including for Ferguson’s under a different owner.
Although that part of Mr Mackay’s reply was given to the committee by Mr McMillan as part of his evidence, Transport Scotland’s.version of the same letter left it out.
In today’s letter to Ms Quinn, committee convener Richard Leonard said MSPs had been “concerned” that two paragraphs had been excluded from Transport Scotland’s evidence, and that “no attempt has been made to correct this omission”.
He went on: “Transport Scotland was given three weeks to return this information, with the offer to contact the clerks if the deadline date presented any difficulties.
“In the year and a half I have been Convener of the Public Audit Committee, this is the only occasion I am aware of where repeated attempts were required to establish when this information would be received.
“The Committee would now ask you to provide a complete version of the former Minister’s letter, along with an explanation of the omission, at your earliest opportunity.”
In a separate letter, the committee has also ask Ms Sturgeon, who gave evidence on the deal in November, for more informationr, including asking for any minutes or notes taken as a result of a meeting she had with former Ferguson owner Jim McColl in May 2017.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel