GORDON Brown’s call for the House of Lords to be replaced with an elected second chamber could take longer than planned after Sir Keir Starmer suggested it might not be deliverable in the first term of a Labour government.
The former prime minister is due to publish a wide-ranging review of the UK constitution tomorrow, with moving to an elected second chamber due to be a key focus.
However, peers have warned that scrapping the Lords could mean Sir Keir using "up a lot of political capital at the expense of other domestic reforms if he goes too fast on this.”
One peer told the Observer: “It sounds a good idea but, in the past, attempts to reform the Lords have led into a political quagmire.”
The report is due to be unveiled by Mr Brown, and Sir Keir in Leeds tomorrow morning.
The two will be joined by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar for an event in Edinburgh in the afternoon.
The former leader was commissioned to undertake the review two years ago, in a bid to woo back voters who had turned to the SNP in Scotland and the Tories in the north of England.
One source told the paper: “Gordon is insisting Keir endorse it all, and wants a headline about Lords abolition … but the leadership don’t.”
Another source close to Mr Brown said: “Gordon’s not interested in just putting recommendations in there for the sake of it. The expectation is that everything that is in the report will become party policy. If he thought Keir wasn’t on board, he wouldn’t be recommending it.”
Speaking to the Times about when he could deliver change, Sir Keir said: “The answer is that this is the bit of the discussion that comes after Monday, because that’s testing the propositions, refining them, and then crucially answering, thinking when and how this is implemented.
“What will require legislation, what won’t require legislation, whether we want to do each of the steps. The purpose of that is to craft a manifesto that says this is the overall project, these are the bits we intend to do in the five years, this is the delivery you can expect to see.”
The report is also understood to have 40 recommendations, including plans for radical devolution of powers to the regions in “the biggest transfer of power out of Westminster ever”.
It will also suggest trust in politics can be restored by banning second jobs for MPs.
The party intends to launch a consultation on the recommendations with many expected to be incorporated into Labour’s next manifesto.
In an article for this weekend’s Observer, Sir Keir said Mr Brown’s proposals “will set the path for the biggest ever transfer of control from Westminster back to the British people.
"It means that at the next election, Labour will stand on a promise of new powers for towns, cities, regions and nations to reignite our economy, while scrapping unaccountable ones in Westminster to restore trust in our politics.
“This is a matter of personal conviction for me. I have always believed that the people best placed to decide what works in Stirling, Sunderland or Swansea are the people there.
“If we expect these places to drive growth we must first hand them the keys. But as well as bringing people closer to decision making, I want to change the very idea of who our politics serves.
“The way this Tory government keeps blithely putting up taxes, while endlessly pearl clutching over the prospect of oil companies or non-doms or Eton College paying their fair share leaves working people with one sense: that Britain is being run for someone, but that it isn’t them. That will change.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel