A MINISTER has admitted his government is decades behind progress needed to decarbonise buildings and has insisted that independence would allow Scottish consumers to reap the economic benefits of net zero.
Patrick Harvie, the Scottish Government’s minister for zero carbon buildings, has acknowledged that ministers are decades behind their European peers in moving away from fossil fuel heating systems.
The co-leader of the Scottish Greens told The Herald that Scotland is making the switch to heating buildings without relying on fossil fuels, that will cost an estimated £33bn, “too late”.
READ MORE: Heat pumps to be as cheap as fossil fuels boilers under grant scheme
He said: “Scotland should have been building energy-efficient homes and things like district heating systems for decades, for generations.
“Some of the other European countries like Denmark that we're working really closely with to draw experience from their work over the last few decades – they've been doing this for a long, long time.
“Scotland should have been in that position. We should not be in the position still where huge numbers of people are living in poor energy inefficient homes and reliant on fossil fuel when we could be already moving quickly to zero emissions heating.”
READ MORE: SNP ministers warned planning shake-up will not solve housing crisis
Mr Harvie added: “The whole world is behind the curve on climate.
"Scotland could and should have been doing a lot more on this for decades.
“So we're not where we should be, but we're moving forward rapidly and I think we've got a very good chance not just of ensuring that the heat in buildings programme helps Scotland meet its national climate targets, but do it in a way that is socially just that helps people out of fuel poverty.”
Edinburgh and Glasgow, with large amounts of tenement flats,have committed to become net zero by 2030 – where Mr Harvie said there was "huge potential" to develop heat networks.
In April, The Herald revealed that Nicola Sturgeon was lobbying the City of London for investment to help fund her government’s net zero strategy – with an admission that private funding will be key to paying for the priority.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon lobbying London firms over 'willingness' to fund net zero policies
On Thursday, Ms Sturgeon announced an expert panel of investors and asset managers will advise on how Scotland can create the right conditions to attract global capital investment to develop a just transition for workers in carbon-intensive industries. But it does not include advising on the heat in buildings strategy, despite the enormous funding shortfall.
Mr Harvie said: “We we've estimated that the overall heat in buildings transition right through to 2045 has been £33 billion.
“If we get that right, it can be done it can be done affordably.
"It will involve a blend of public investment, as well as investment by private building owners.
“You need to be making sure that that private investment is supported by public investment, including through loans and grants. This is a huge job of work.
“We could have been building much more energy efficient homes for 20, 30, 40 years – we haven't been so we now have a retrofit job to do as well as raising the new build standards.”
Mr Harvie has claimed that an independent Scotland could make faster progress in reaching legal climate targets than if the country remains tied to the United Kingdom.
Scotland has pledged to cut 1990 levels of carbon emissions by 75 per cent by 2030 and end its contribution to the climate crisis in 2045 by becoming net zero.
The Greens co-leader said Scotland needs “to up the scale of ambition”.
READ MORE: Analysis: Greens' vague argument for independence may have weakened case
He added: “There are areas where we could do more with the full powers of independence.
“For example, Scotland's generating a huge amount of electricity from renewables – it's cheap, it's abundant, it's going to continue to grow and yet, Scottish consumers don't get the value of that in their electricity bills, because the UK regulates the energy market in such a way that electricity prices are effectively set according to gas prices.
“Now, that's absurd and we've argued that they need to break that artificial link between electricity and gas prices – we've argued that for years.
“They keep indicating that at some point it may happen – that's not enough.”
Mr Harvie added: “We need to act with pace and if we have the power to regulate separately in Scotland, we could stay part of an overall GB electricity market, but we could make sure that domestic consumers get the benefit of that cheap, abundant domestic renewable energy supply.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel