THE SCOTTISH Conservatives have renewed their call for gender recognition proposals to be put on hold – pointing to a United Nations official raising concerns about the plans.
SNP ministers have brought forward plans to update the process for trans people obtaining a gender recognition certificate – moving from needing a diagnosis of gender dysphoria to a method of self-ID.
Under the plans, supported by all Holyrood parties except the Conservatives, the lower age limit will be reduced to 16.
The Tories have renewed their call for the legislation to be put on hold – once again pointing to comments made by UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem.
Ms Alsalem has warned the proposed legislation “presents potential risks to the safety of women”, claiming the plans could “open the door for violent males who identify as men to abuse the process”.
The legislation makes it an offence to fraudulently obtain a gender recognition certificate, a document not required to enter single sex spaces.
An amendment brought forward by Conservative MSP Jamie Greene, backed by the Scottish Government, would add an aggravator in the courts – meaning fraudsters would face harsher penalties for abusing the system.
Holyrood’s Equalities, Human Rights and Social Justice Committee did not take evidence from Ms Alsalem with the Conservatives calling for the legislative process to be put on hold until she has done.
However, the committee did hear from Victor Madrigal-Borloz, the United Nations’ independent expert on gender identity, who told MSPs that gender recognition process “should be based on self-determination” instead of the current set-up.
Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton has penned a letter to Nicola Sturgeon, calling on the First Minister to “suspend” the legislation until “evidence can be taken fully from the United Nations”.
In her letter, Ms Hamilton warned that Ms Alsalem “has recently raised serious concerns about the current bill”.
She added: “In light of this new evidence, which neither the Scottish Parliament not the committee considering the bill has considered, I am asking that you suspend this legislation until we can hear from this United Nations expert.
“The Government must listen. It is vitally important that we make good laws with proper and full consideration of all the consequences.
“It would be grossly unfair to women and girls with sincere and valid concerns about this legislation if the Government was to be selective and cherry-pick the opinions it relied on while ignoring a UN adviser who has expertise in this very area.
“It would be far better to pause the legislation for a few weeks than rush through a bill that could have potentially damaging consequences for women’s rights and safety.”
Speaking at First Minister’s Questions in response to Tory MSP Pam Gosul’s similar question, Ms Sturgeon said “it is violent men that we”.
She added: “They continue to pose the biggest risk to women. I don’t believe that we should further stigmatise the trans community because of the actions of violent men.
“Violent men who right now want to access women-only spaces do not need a gender recognition certificate to do that.
The First Minister told MSPs the Scottish Government will “respond in full” to the comments made by Ms Alsalem.
She added: “The Social Justice Secretary will respond in detail on the issues raised – many of these issues have been discussed and addressed already by Parliament during stages one and two of the bill.
“Of course, parliament will have the opportunity to discuss the bill again at stage three of the legislative process.”
*This year the Herald is running its best Black Friday offer to date - with four months of access for just £1. Subscribe and support our work at https://www.heraldscotland.com/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel