THE LABOUR leader of Edinburgh City Council has been accused of “bypassing democracy and dodging scrutiny” after he was forced to apologise for backing a green freeport bid without permission.
The authority will now be forced to tell both the Scottish and UK governments that a letter of support for a freeport bid on the Forth was “premature” after council leader Cammy Day backed the proposal without the support of councillors.
Councillors had debated the bid by Forth Ports earlier this year and agreed further information was needed before officially backing the proposals.
But due to the deadline for bids falling over the summer, council officials in consultation with Mr Day, decided to support the bid.
SNP, LibDems and Green councillors have teamed up to insist Mr Day and the council’s chief executive, Andrew Kerr pen a letter to both the UK and Scottish government to inform them the authority has not officially backed the bid.
Cllr Day apologised to councillors.
He said: “I was new in post but that’s not an excuse, we should have followed the process so I apologise for that.
“All along my ambition has been to ensure there would be a fair work agenda, good jobs, commitment to living wages and all the conditions we would expect including a unionised workforce.”
SNP Edinburgh group leader, Adam McVey, said: "It's startling that a decision taken by councillors in March this year was ignored by Labour, bypassing democracy and dodging scrutiny.
“Yet again we're hearing "sorry, we won't do it again" from Labour. This administration's ineptitude and arrogance continues to cause damage to our Council and to undermine democratic decisions, just as it did over the collapse of Edinburgh's Christmas contract.
"We need more information before the Council takes a final position on this bid. We will consider those details but we need to be assured that any bid meets climate objectives, promotes and protects fair work and keeps essential tax revenue that are so important in the current financial climate."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel