MPS have backed a call for Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng to waive at least £6000 of the golden goodbyes they are entitled to for no longer being ministers.
Labour’s motion went through the Commons ‘on the nod’ without a formal vote.
It followed shadow communities secretary Lisa Nandy telling MPs it was “obscene” that the former Prime Minister was entitled to a severance payment of almost £19,000 after just seven weeks in office, while her Chancellor was “set to rake in £17,000” for even less.
Labour’s censure motion called on the pair to forgo at least £6000 each because of their “mismanagement of the economy while in office”, with the sum said to be equal to average yearly increase in mortgage costs.
Opposition day motions are not binding, and while past governments always tried to vote them down, recent administrations prefer MPs to abstain in these votes and ignore them.
However Labour said the Commons had not passed a similar censure motion since the 1970s, when such votes were considered binding.
Tory housing minister Lucy Frazer said it was not “appropriate” to make arbitrary demands of individuals in relation to their entitlements, which were entirely at their own discretion.
She said Ms Truss and Mr Kwarteng “both served as ministers for a considerable amount of time before they were made prime minister and chancellor of the exchequer, and they therefore have a statutory entitlement”.
She added: “That’s not to say ministers are not able to waive such payments. That is not a matter for the Government…. (it) is entirely discretionary matter for individuals concerned.”
The housing minister also claimed it was “wholly inaccurate” to blame the mini-budget for mortgage rate increases, leading to jeers and heckles from the opposite benches.
The debate also saw Paul Howell, the Tory MP for Sedgefield, forced to apologise to three frontbench female Labour MPs after he suggested they should “shut up” and listen to him.
There were gasps as he said: “You have chirped and talked – do you want to hear or do you want to shut up?”. He then immediately apologised.
Deputy Commons Speaker Nigel Evans accepted the apology, but reminded the Opposition: “This isn’t a chat. This is a debate.”
Shadow minister Sarah Owen said later in the debate: “When he tells us to ‘shut up’, no. “When people in this country are suffering, when people in this country cannot afford their bills, and when people in this country cannot get onto the housing ladder, no.
“I will never shut up, because they crashed the economy and we will always and proudly be on the side of ordinary working people. Perhaps maybe he should go away and learn some manners.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel