THE SNP Westminster leader has been urged to correct the House of Commons records after using “completely fictitious” figures to boast about Scotland’s renewables potential.
Ian Blackford has been told to publicly apologise in the Commons after using a false figure to describe Scotland’s potential to scale up offshore wind in a debate on independence.
The SNP Westminster leader told MPs that Scotland holds around one quarter of Europe’s offshore potential.
Speaking in the Commons, he said: “We have the potential to generate around 10% of Europe’s wave power and possess 25% of the potential European offshore wind and tidal resource”.
SNP deputy leader Kirsten Oswald also used the figure.
She said: “In 2020, almost 100% of Scotland’s electricity demand was generated by renewables and Scotland has 25% of Europe’s offshore wind and tidal potential, meaning that Scotland can and will become the renewable powerhouse of Europe”.
But analysis by unionist think tank, These Islands, has debunked the 25% figure – with the organisation claiming the number is between 4% and 6%.
The Scottish Government has admitted that the figure is now out of date and will now be updating the data. But These Islands have insisted the figure was never true.
The LibDems are now calling on Mr Blackford to stand up in the Commons and correct the official record.
LibDems Scottish affairs spokesperson, Christine Jardine, has now penned a letter to the SNP Westminster leader, calling on him to make amends for using the figure.
She said: “This week, it was revealed by the think tanks These Islands that a key Scottish Government statistic is false – that Scotland has 25% of Europe’s potential offshore wind resource. “Over the years this has been referenced countless times both inside and outside of both parliaments by SNP ministers, MPs and MSPs.
“As These Islands have demonstrated, this figure is the product of a bogus analysis of a mixture of reports dating all the way back to 1993, when the technology was in its infancy, and relies upon a definition of Europe that excludes renewable powerhouses like Sweden, Norway and Finland.”
Last month, fact-checking service Full Fact found that Scottish Government claims over how much of Scotland’s electricity is from renewables sources was inaccurate.
In September, Nicola Sturgeon insisted the country has “now got 100% self-sufficiency in our electricity requirements from renewables.”
Mr Blackford has also repeated that claim.
Full Fact found that in 2020, 62% of electricity produced in Scotland came from renewables – with 26% being generated from low-carbon sources such as nuclear and 11% from fossil fuels.
Ms Jardine added: “In last week’s debate on Scottish independence, both yourself and your colleagues Kirsten Oswald and Ronnie Cowan repeated this falsehood.
“Kirsten Oswald also went on to claim that ‘In 2020, almost 100% of Scotland’s electricity demand was generated by renewables’. The First Minister herself has recently acknowledged that this is untrue.
“Our country is home to a host of pioneering firms working in the renewable sector and I am keen to see Scotland fulfil our renewable potential but it will do little to build trust in the industry if Scottish parliamentarians use figures that cannot be backed up.
“Given that this figure is completely fictitious, I believe it is only appropriate that you rise in the House of Commons to correct the record. I think it is also important that yourself and your colleagues commit not to repeat this falsehood further.”
The SNP did not respond to requests for comment.
The false claim dates as far back as Alex Salmond’s SNP administration.
Research carried out by Mr Salmond’s Alba party has claimed that Scotland is actually on course to deliver 46% of Europe’s actual offshore grid supply by 2035 based on an EU publication which sets out the projected installation capacity of the EU by 2050.
Mr Salmond’s party has also claimed that Scotland’s target, which is on course, of delivering 42GW through offshore wind energy by 2035 will amount to more than 55% of the entire offshore grid potential available.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel