THE GREENS launched the party’s own case for independence yesterday – but the vague document will do little, if anything, to convince undecided voters to back the Yes campaign.
The Scottish Government has launched a series of papers setting out the new independence case.
Green co-leader Patrick Harvie stood alongside the First Minister as she unveiled her first paper.
But Mr Harvie and the Greens have had very little say, publicly, in what is being put forward.
The Greens’ pamphlet, launched yesterday, which contains just 11 pages of text, offers votes no new policies but plenty of confusion.
Crucially, the document includes no detail on how much any of it will cost or how it will be funded.
Read more: Patrick Harvie suggests Scotland cannot hit net zero targets as part of Union
If there is an independence referendum held next October, the document will potentially muddy what Scotland would be voting for by backing the Yes campaign.
Mr Harvie was quick to point out that his party would like an independent Scotland to be a republic, whereas the Scottish Government would keep the monarchy as the head of state. But there’s no clarity over which case for independence is the one that counts.
The Greens insist that political parties “setting out their own stall” for independence does not do anything to “undermine” the Yes case – but the move has certainly added to the narrative that the reality of independence remains unknown.
Unionist parties have jumped on the lack of detail, new policies and mention of the economics behind the Greens’ wafer-thin paper.
Read more: Has the world wasted a year since COP26?
Under questioning from journalists, Mr Harvie insisted that his party’s plans for a universal basic income would be “more affordable” than the current social security system in place from the UK Government.
But puzzlingly, he knew this despite not knowing how much it would cost – admitting no sums had been done since the 2014 referendum.
The only policy mentioned to achieve “a happier Scotland” is “a four-day working week with no loss of pay”. Again, there’s no detail of how much this will cost.
The pamphlet offers very little to voters as to how, practically, an independent Scotland could operate. The first paper fails to acknowledge currency, borders and the economy – the big issues those on the fence about separation need convinced over.
Instead, the launch seems to appeal to the Greens membership.
The campaign appears to signal to the party’s grassroots that the party still has a place in the Yes movement and hasn’t been swallowed up by its backseat role in government.
Instead of strengthening the case for independence, the inward-looking strategy may accidentally have weakened it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel