LIZ Truss has been accused of a “sweeping betrayal” of pensioners after it emerged the Prime Minister is not standing by her commitment to increase state pensions in line with soaring inflation.
Downing Street indicated ministers could ditch their commitment to the triple lock pensions as the new Chancellor Jeremy Hunt was brought in to save Ms Truss’s faltering leadership searches to plug a multi-billion pound black hole.
Mr Hunt told colleagues at a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday that they must find savings from their departmental budgets.
As recently as October 2 Ms Truss was clear state pensions would increase in April by whichever is highest – 2.5%, wages or inflation.
“I’ve committed to the triple lock. Yes,” she said in a BBC interview.
But, after replacing Kwasi Kwarteng as Chancellor after their disastrous mini-budget, Downing Street backed down on this pledge.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “We are very aware of how many vulnerable pensioners there are and indeed our priority ahead of this fiscal plan is we continue to protect the most vulnerable in society.
“The Prime Minister and the Chancellor are not making any commitments on individual policy areas at this point, but as I say the decisions will be made through the prism of what matters most to the most vulnerable.”
The spokesman did, however, stand by the commitment of increasing defence spending to 3% of GDP by 2030.
In the Commons on Monday, Mr Hunt did not rule out the triple lock being suspended as he refused to make any commitments on “individual policy areas”.
SNP’s shadow work and pensions secretary, Kirsty Blackman, said: “In 2014 pensioners in Scotland were told the only way they could protect their pensions was with a no vote, eight years on and now every pension in the country is under threat with the Tories’ disgraceful U-turn on the triple lock.
“It has become crystal clear that only independence can protect pensioners from the callousness of this Conservative Party and Tory Austerity 2.0
“This is a sweeping betrayal to over 12 million pensioners who were guaranteed in the Tories' manifesto to see a continuation of the triple lock in this parliamentary term - another broken Tory promise."
She added: “Under the Westminster Tories, UK pensioners already receive one of the lowest pensions in all of North West Europe by comparison with the average wage.
“It’s glaringly obvious that Westminster does not serve the interests of pensioners in Scotland and that the full powers of independence are needed to deliver fairness and dignity for our elderly.”
Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary Jonathan Ashworth said: “Tory MPs have already imposed this year the biggest real-terms pension cut ever for Britain’s retirees and their disastrous budget has them considering further cuts to pensioners’ incomes.
“Pensioners deserve so much better than Liz Truss and her disastrous mistakes that are leaving older people paying the price.”
The Liberal Democrats’s pensions spokeswoman Wendy Chamberlain added: “It would be a kick in the teeth for millions of people if Truss now backtracks on her triple lock promise. The British public will never forgive the Conservative Party if they break this promise.”
Around 12.5 million people who receive the state pension could be dealt a real-terms cut in earnings if their payments do not rise in line with inflation, standing at around 10%.
On Wednesday, the Office for National Statistics will publish the Consumer Price Index measure of inflation, on which changes to benefits and pension payments are calculated.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel