SNP ministers have been warned that no-one will want to replace the chairperson and legal counsels who resigned from Scotland’s Covid inquiry.
A lawyer who is representing some of the bereaved families impacted, has said the probe is set to be held up and is “going nowhere”.
A row has erupted after the chairperson of the inquiry, Lady Poole, resigned last week – before it emerged this followed four legal counsel had also quit.
Deputy First Minister John Swinney was forced to deny “secrecy” after he did not tell MSPs about the four resignations.
Speaking on BBC Good Morning Scotland, Professor Peter Watson, said the progress of the inquiry was “going nowhere”.
He said: "It is extraordinary, to say the least, for people such as counsel to the inquiry and others to resign their post and leave.
"Most lawyers would find ways to work round any perceived difficulties but for lawyers to say they will no longer accept instructions – quite extraordinary."
Professor Watson said it will be difficult for a replacement to be found for Lady Poole because they were "particularly eminent - at the top of their particular branch of the law".
He added: "When you lose somebody like Douglas Ross, you're asking another eminent [KC] to come forward, give up two or three years of their practice to do nothing else but this inquiry and when they finish it, I mean, they won't have any practice left."
Asked about who would want to replace Lady Poole, Professor Watson said: “"In my vote no-one. It's a hospital pass."
He added that a replacement would be "difficult to get".
He said: "Whatever happens, even in a best-case scenario, delay is inevitable.
"Some explanation will be necessary.
"Those I represent and I think the wider body of those affected by this pandemic are disappointed and bewildered at the current situation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel