LIZ Truss has suggested a second vote on independence should not go ahead even if the Supreme Court deems the Scottish Government’s case for holding one as legally sound.
The Scottish Government has pre-empted UK Government court action over its proposals for Holyrood to legislate and hold its own referendum without the consent of Tory ministers.
The Supreme Court will give a view on whether such a move for a referendum is legally competent within the devolution agreement.
But the Prime Minister has suggested that even if the Supreme Court rules that Holyrood is within its right to hold a re-run of the 2014 referendum, a vote should still not be held.
Speaking to ITV Border, Ms Truss was asked “if the Supreme Court rules another referendum is legal, will you be leading the campaign to keep Scotland in the Union?”
She said: “I’m very clear that in 2014, when there was a referendum, we said it is once in a generation.
I asked the Prime Minister about what she will do if the Supreme Court rules another Scottish independence referendum is legal
— Tom Sheldrick (@TomSheldrickITV) October 3, 2022
She said: "I'm very clear there shouldn't be another referendum before [a] generation is up" pic.twitter.com/bvJtAaI2GN
“I’m very clear there shouldn’t be another referendum before that generation is up.”
SNP MSP Christine Graham said: “It’s quite extraordinary for a Prime Minister to allude to the fact that even if the Supreme Court argues that we can have a consultative referendum, it appears that she would try to oppose this.
“She is opposing the law of the highest courts in the land, but then, nothing will surprise me about Liz Truss.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel