THROUGHOUT her tortuous Tory leadership battle with the also-ran Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss promised to “hit the ground running” if the baton were passed to her. On her first day as PM, she raced out the starting blocks with an eye watering £150 billion package of emergency energy support measures.
These were welcome interventions to reduce the skyrocketing energy bills for householders and industry.
With the domestic energy price cap for a typical household set to rise in October to a humongous £3,549, she announced that domestic energy bills would now be capped at £2,500 annually until 2024. The government would compensate energy firms the difference between the wholesale price of gas and energy they pay, and the amount charged to customers. The relief felt by many worried householders was almost palpable.
In her statement, which lacked clarity and any meaningful detail, businesses were also promised help, but only for six months, which was cold comfort for firms already struggling to meet payments and burdened with huge legacy debts from the pandemic and rises in supplier costs, staffing and soaring interest rates.
Truss was in a rush to set her stamp on government, but her “unashamed”, “bold and brash” dash for economic growth was, as we know, curtailed in the saddest of circumstances, overtaken and completely overshadowed by an epochal event. The death of our 96-year-old monarch Queen Elizabeth.
On Wednesday, nearly two weeks after the country was plunged into a period of national mourning, Liz Truss and her new cabinet finally got back to running the country, albeit from the UN and through pre-prepared video messages and press releases.
In an unprecedented government intervention, Business and Energy Secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg announced that a six-month multi-billion pound energy support package for businesses, charities and public sector organisations would indeed come into play from the beginning of October.
The UK government scheme means wholesale electricity prices would be fixed at £211 per megawatt hour, and gas prices capped at £75 per mwh. An important intervention that will halve energy bills for businesses this winter and save many firms from going under, but only if those discounts are in turn passed on by their energy suppliers. It should also be remembered that this cap is only taking the energy price back to April levels, which were already proving to be unaffordable to many energy-heavy businesses.
Michael Kill, CEO of the UK Night Time Industries Association, said, “We welcome the long-awaited announcement of the “Energy Bill Relief Scheme”. However, we remain concerned that the measure to cap the wholesale price to energy supply companies may not result in sufficient relief being extended by the suppliers to business customers, who remain free to impose additional uncapped mark-ups such as network charges and operating costs.
"It is also imperative that this announcement is followed up with further action by the Government, and incorporates our core asks, specifically business rates relief and a VAT reduction across the board.”
Stuart Patrick, chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said: “There are still other difficulties facing companies. Staff shortages, inflation and supply chain issues are all massive barriers which businesses are facing. Whilst we are encouraged that government are taking this action to address the energy costs, we still require further movement to address the overall cost of operating to help businesses thrive.”
It is hoped that the new chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng will today, in his mini budget, not make a mess of it, and accept that in order to survive, businesses need more than just a six-month energy freeze. That he will introduce a long-term business strategy to encourage growth, not a temporary sticking plaster, one which will stimulate the economy, and protect jobs and livelihoods. A major reduction in the VAT rate and a business rate relief package would do just that.
If not, I fear that this government will have hit the ground running, but only to take the UK in a race to the bottom of the abyss.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel