OVER 100,000 part time workers could lose their benefits if they do not agree to work more hours.
Details of the reform to Universal Credit are set to be unveiled in Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-budget tomorrow.
The Scottish Greens described the policy as a “despicable and needless act of cruelty against low paid and vulnerable people.”
However, the Chancellor said it was a “win-win” and would help “grow the economy and raise living standards for all.”
The change should mean that around 120,000 people claiming Universal Credit will need to have more meetings with Jobcentre work coaches and increase their search for work or take on more hours.
It impacts something known as the Administration Earnings Threshold which determines whether a claimant is in the "light touch" regime or the "intensive work search" regime.
Currently, if you work more than nine hours a week, then you do not need to search for more work.
That is due to increase to 12 hours or more from next week.
But under the new plans, it will increase to 15 hours at the start of 2023.
Those in the intensive work search need to meet regularly with their work coach and actively search for jobs, take interviews, and accept offers of work or risk losing their entitlement to Universal Credit.
Mr Kwarteng is also set to announce support for over-50s to get back to work following a significant drop in numbers following the pandemic.
If economic activity among over-50s returns to previous levels, the government estimates it could increase GDP by one percentage point, or £29billion.
The Chancellor said although unemployment is at its lowest rate since the early 1970s, the high number of vacancies is "limiting economic growth".
“Our jobs market is remarkably resilient, but it is not perfect,” Mr Kwarteng said.
“While unemployment is at is at its lowest rate for nearly 50 years, the high number of vacancies that still exist and inactivity in the labour market is limiting economic growth.
“These gradual changes focus on getting people back into work and maximising the hours people take on to help grow the economy and raise living standards for all. It boosts incomes for families and helps businesses get the domestic workers they need, all while supporting economic growth.”
He added: "We must get Britain working again. These gradual changes focus on getting people back into work and maximising the hours that people take on to help grow the economy and raise living standards for all.
"It's a win-win. It boosts incomes for families and helps businesses get the domestic workers they need, all while supporting economic growth."
The move was condemned by Nicola Sturgeon during First Minister's Questions.
She compared it to plans to axe the cap on bankers' bonuses, expected to be announced by the Chancellor in tomorrow's mini-budget.
Ms Sturgeon told MSPs the Scottish government used their powers and resources to "try to lift people out of poverty" while "the UK Government takes actions that push people into poverty."
She added: "That is not a sustainable, sensible or morally defensible position.
"The UK Government now seems to want to increase the bonuses that are paid to bankers, while further eroding the incomes of those who are on universal credit. That is utterly indefensible.
"We are showing what we can do with the limited welfare powers that we have—the Scottish child payment is the leading example of that.
"As long as so many such powers and levers lie with a UK Government that is acting in the way that this one is, our efforts will continue to be undermined. That is why it is so important that we get all such powers into this Parliament’s hands as soon as possible."
Scottish Greens social security spokesperson, Maggie Chapman said: "I truly hope that these reports are wrong. Even by the standards of the Tories this would be a despicable and needless act of cruelty against low paid and vulnerable people.
She added: "Prices and bills are soaring, but wages are flat lining or worse. The Tories have proven that they cannot be trusted with our economy. It is not workers who have fuelled this crisis, it is Downing Street and their millionaire pals."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel