BORIS Johnson’s official jet was used for a drink-fuelled "jolly" by civil servants, according to a report.
The Sun says that the 700-mile round trip for 12 mandarins cost the taxpayer £50,000.
The 90-minute sightseeing flight took the Foreign Office officials from Stansted up to the Lake District, over Moffat before heading back south again.
They were, according to the paper, served a “fancy meal” on board with a selection of alcoholic drinks.
Though, Sky News later reported that the meal was not "fancy" and was just the "usual catering for a flight".
A spokesperson for the government said the trip was necessary because of strict rules around planes sitting idle.
They said: "In order to comply with Airbus and aviation industry rules, the aircraft was legally bound to operate a maintenance flight before 4 September or face significant additional storage costs."
However, the Sun quoted a source who said the inclusion of the civil servants meant that it was effectively a “jolly”.
Labour’s Shadow Trade Secretary Emily Thornberry blasted the officials: “This would be utterly disgraceful behaviour at the best of times, but in the middle of our country’s current crisis, it is shameful beyond words.”
The paper claims the plane is estimated to have pumped out around 300kg of CO2 emissions during the flight.
The RAF Voyager plane is shared between Boris Johnson and the Royal Family. Once grey, it was resprayed white, and given a Union Jack on its tail in a controversial £900,000 makeover.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel