THE Scottish Conservative party has publicly divided over who to support in the contest to replace Boris Johnson as Prime Minister.
Nine MSPs, including more than of the party’s front bench at Holyrood, came out for frontrunner Foreign Secretary Liz Truss on Monday.
Today, eight other MSPs and two MPs came out for the underdog in the Tory leadership race, the former Chancellor Rishi Sunak.
Writing in the Times, the group backing Ms Truss, who spent some of her childhood in Paisley, said she was a “child of the Union” who would secure the future of the UK.
The nine include Murdo Fraser, Rachael Hamilton, Liam Kerr, Stephen Kerr, and Oliver Mundell, who are all members of Douglas Ross’s shadow cabinet.
Also backing Ms Truss are Finlay Carson, Sharon Downey, Douglas Lumsden and Graham Simpson.
The nine said Ms Truss, who is promising £30bn of unfunded tax cuts, would “break with Treasury orthodoxy by investing directly in projects in Scotland that will benefit the families, communities and businesses we represent ''.
However in the Telegraph today, the ten supporters of Mr Sunak said he was most likely to win the general election and so stop “any dodgy backroom deal” between Labour and the SNP.
They also said the former Chancellor was best placed to unite the Tory party after a bitter and often highly personal campaign.
"In a time of crisis we need strong, competent leadership," they added, suggesting Ms Truss offered neither.
The ten are former leader Jackson Carlaw, MSPs Donald Cameron, Liz Smith, Miles Briggs, Maurice Golden, Jeremy Balfour, Dean Lockhart and Alexander Stewart, and MPs John Lamont and Andrew Bowie.
Mr Ross has refused to pick a side in public, leading to accusations from the SNP that the Scottish Tory leader is a coward.
Asked about the split on BBC Radio Scotland this morning, Mr Fraser said it was merely a sign of a healthy debate in the party over the leadership.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel