THE leader of Glasgow City Council has promised that a Eurovision on the banks of the Clyde would be a “Ukranian event.”
Susan Aitken told the BBC that whoever wins the competition to hold the contest would be a “venue city or a location rather than a host.”
So far, Glasgow is the only Scottish city to confirm that they are entering the competition to hold the international pop spectacular.
Edinburgh is waiting until they have more detail on what’s expected of the host city, while Aberdeen is looking “at the implications for the Council".
According to Betfair, Glasgow, at 5/6, is the odds-on favourite to be named host, while Edinburgh is at 18/1 and Aberdeen is far behind on 25/1.
Speaking to the Today programme, Cllr Aitken said Glasgow had everything Eurovision required. She said: “This is a challenging event to host, it's complex. The logistics involved are actually nearly as significant as a COP.
“And of course Glasgow has just hosted a COP and we did so in very challenging circumstances and extremely successfully.
"We have all of the basics that are required for an event of this size, but we've also got that extra something, being a UNESCO city of music, famed for the warmth of our welcome, and literally actually named in an Abba song, which I think gives us a bit of an edge as well.
“We've got the backing of a Eurovision winner, Lulu, as well. So we think we're well pleased but certainly, I will heartily congratulate any of the UK cities who takes this on, remembering of course that we're doing this on behalf of Ukraine. So whoever it is, would be a venue city or a location rather than a host.”
Jonathan Pryor, the leader of Leeds Council, agreed, saying this would be “Ukraine's party.”
“We're just inviting them to hold it in our house,” he added.
In a statement, the City of Edinburgh Council Leader Cammy Day pointed out that Scotland’s capital was twinned with Kyiv.
He said: “Edinburgh had the pleasure of hosting Eurovision 50 years ago at our very own Usher Hall – the first time it had been held outside London.
“Of course, I’d far rather the event was being held in Kyiv but, as its sister city and new home to many thousands of Ukrainians, Edinburgh would be a fitting host. Clearly, the scale of the event has grown since 1972, but we’ll look at all options and make a decision on whether to bid as soon as we can.”
An Aberdeen City Council spokesperson said officers were looking “at the implications for the Council of hosting this international event and its huge fanbase.”
They added: “The Eurovision Song Contest is a massive event with a worldwide audience. We have the city, the people and infrastructure to support international events such as this and it would provide a major boost to the Aberdeen and Scottish economies and raise the city’s profile with potential investors and visitors.”
Glasgow’s bid received a boost on Monday night from previous contest winner Lulu.
She told Newsnight: "It has to be Glasgow because that's where I come from. They're so politically savvy, they're the most fabulous hosts, they absolutely are music mad.
"I think it would be just the most fabulous thing, and I would be there. I just cannot wait."
Lulu represented the UK at the 1969 Eurovision Song Contest with the song Boom Bang-a-Bang. It was voted one of four joint winners that night.
Betfair spokesperson Sam Rosbottom said: “After the European Broadcasting Union confirmed the UK will host Eurovision 2023, Glasgow have emerged as the 5/6 odds-on favourites to anchor the song contest. Other potential host cities include Manchester at 10/3 and London at 5/1, while Birmingham is 9/1.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel