THE SUPREME Court is to proceed to a full hearing to examine the Scottish Government's bid to hold an independence referendum without the consent of ministers in London.
A plea by the UK government to have the case thrown out at the preliminary stage because it is "premature" has been refused, instead, the justices will now consider this argument at the same time as they examine whether or not Holyrood can hold a vote.
Last month, the First Minister stunned MSPs when she revealed that she had asked Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain to request a ruling from the justices on the legality of the Scottish Parliament staging its own vote without the agreement of Westminster.
However, last week, Lord Stewart of Dirleton, the UK Government’s Advocate General, asked the court to dismiss the Scottish law officer’s reference.
He said that by seeking to establish whether a Referendum Bill is within the parliament’s devolved competence before that bill has passed would raise “important legal questions which cut across the statutory process”.
READ MORE: UK Government asks Supreme Court to throw out referendum bid
In a reply sent to both sides, and obtained by both the National and the Telegraph, the Supreme Court said judges would consider whether the request was premature at the same time as examining the issue of whether Holyrood can hold an independence referendum.
The court has told the Scottish and UK governments to submit legal papers setting out their cases by Aug 9.
Judges will then rule on whether to hear the case orally or not.
In a statement, the Supreme Court said there were two issues to consider.
First, whether the Court "can or should accept the reference and, second, if so, how it should answer the question the Lord Advocate has referred to it."
To answer these questions, the Court said it would "need to consider the circumstances giving rise to the reference and the substance of the Lord Advocate’s question.
"The Court therefore decided that it should hear argument on both issues at a single hearing in the interests of justice and the efficient disposal of the proceedings."
UK Government sources told the Telegraph they remained "quite relaxed" and "very confident" they will triumph in the court case.
Ian Blackford, the SNP’s Westminster leader, welcomed the news. He told the National: “I’m glad to hear the Supreme Court are not going to be browbeaten by a UK Government that are trying to stop democracy from taking place. In the end we will prevail. Let’s wait and see what happens.”
Setting out her “route map” to independence in June, the First Minister said she intends to hold a second referendum on October 19 next year, if the UK Supreme Court says she has the power to do so.
The First Minister said that if the court refused it would be “the fault of Westminster legislation” and she would fight the next general election as a “de facto referendum” on the single issue of independence.
If the SNP won a majority of votes cast, it would regard it as a mandate to open independence negotiations with London.
A spokesperson for the Scottish Government said: “Whether the reference is accepted, how long it takes to determine, which matters the court considers and when and what judgment is arrived at are all for the court to determine.
"The reference is now before the Supreme Court, and the Court should be allowed to fulfil its function.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: “We appreciate the Supreme Court dealing with our application quickly.
"We will proceed to prepare our written case on the preliminary points we have noted, and on the substantive issue, to the timetable set out by the Court.
“On the question of legislative competence, the UK Government’s clear view remains that a Bill legislating for a referendum on independence would be outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel