SHAMED former SNP minister Derek Mackay has insisted he had “confidence” he could push ahead with awarding a controversial ferries contract despite risks being identified.
The two vessels – the Glen Sannox and the as-yet-unnamed hull 802 – were originally due to be completed in 2018, but have since been delayed until at least 2023.
They are also vastly over budget, with the latest estimated cost being at least £250 million.
Mr Mackay held the transport brief at the time the contract was approved, and an email trail uncovered by the Scottish Government last month suggests he made the final decision in 2015.
He resigned in February 2020 as finance secretary after a sleaze scandal involving a 16-year-old schoolboy.
Mr Mackay has told MSPs that the “necessary process, procurement assessment and milestone stages” had been followed, adding that “therefore I had confidence in the recommendation” to award the contract.
But Mr Mackay acknowledged he “appreciated that risks had been identified and understood to be resolved”.
elevant officials” had been involved in the submission, upon receiving information on concerns from procurement body Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (Cmal) over Ferguson Marine being unable to offer a full builder’s refund guarantee.
Mr Mackay said there was “no further information requested or discussion that I recall” from stakeholders on the matter.
The former transport minister said he had appreciated that risks were identified and were understood to be resolved, but had “confidence” in the recommendation to proceed with awarding the contract as the submission had followed the “necessary process, procurement assessment and milestone stages”.
He added: “There was a high level of confidence in the yard, which had successfully completed other vessels for the CalMac fleet.
“There was also an expectation that there would be sufficient monitoring and oversight.”
Mr Mackay said he was first made aware of problems and delays in December 2016, after which he was updated “as appropriate” by officials.
In order to resolve the dispute, Mr Mackay said he “made every effort to take advice, ensure fairness, provide challenge and support to officials, engage with other ministers and request review and independent intervention when necessary”.
However, he said Scottish ministers did not force Cmal and Ferguson Marine to use the dispute resolution mechanisms within the contracts as the nature of the row would have “rendered such a forced action redundant”.
Mr Mackay was quizzed on why the Scottish Government took the decision to nationalise the struggling shipyard without having a full understanding of the costs and challenges involved.
He said it was believed that the best way to deliver on the completion of the vessels, safeguard the jobs of the workforce and secure future shipbuilding on the Clyde was to proceed with nationalisation, and he added the move would have included “a range of considerations”.
He wrote: “The option of finding another commercial buyer was also not ruled out, but the public ownership option was the best outcome at the time and the right thing to do in the circumstances.”
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: “The committee will consider the content of the letters, and next steps, when it meets on Thursday.
“At that meeting, the committee looks forward to hearing from the chief executive officer, interim chair and former chair of Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited as it continues its scrutiny of the Auditor General’s report.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel