It was one of the defining episodes of the 1960s – a student-initiated revolt against the old order that led to a general strike and economic paralysis across France.
So widespread and disruptive were the events of “May ‘68” that President Charles de Gaulle was forced to flee to Baden-Baden in Germany, where he met with General Jacques Massu, commander of the French occupation forces, to discuss the possibility of intervention by the army.
The civil unrest that followed from a seemingly innocuous protest over dormitory visit restrictions at Paris Nanterre University continues to reverberate in the collective imagination. It has numerous echoes in popular culture, including Walter Henry “Wolfie” Smith, Robert Lindsay’s much-loved “urban guerrilla” from the 1970s sitcom Citizen Smith, and Rick, the conceited poet-anarchist played by Rik Mayall in The Young Ones.
There are worries, however, that today’s campuses have been drained of the same activist spirit.
READ MORE: Education expert asks if SNP will be 'honest' about past record
Student leaders are under pressure to explain why they have not taken to the streets as institutions suffer the effects of lecturer strikes and a relentless funding squeeze. Some have also suggested that those representing learners are in the pocket of management and do not want to confront bosses in public.
Concerns emerged during a meeting of Holyrood’s Education, Children and Young People Committee, with Willie Rennie of the Scottish Liberal Democrats highlighting the lack of protests. Addressing student leaders who had been asked to appear before MSPs, he said: “When I was in higher education, student unions were a source of revolution and agitation, and I’ve not really picked that up today. The college sector has faced 10 years’ worth of cuts. They [have] flat cash over the next few years and 43,000 whole-time equivalent places have been lost over several years. And I’m just wondering why you’re not angry and why you’re not protesting.”
The committee’s guests insisted they were angry but stressed that action “doesn’t seem to make much difference”.
Willie Rennie has asked why students are not protesting against college cuts.
Kirsten Koss, depute president (Aberdeen/Altens) at North East Scotland College Students’ Association, said: “We’ve gone through the National Union of Students (NUS) and NUS have said how angry we are about it. But, whatever we do, it doesn’t seem to make a difference. We’re angry about the cuts and we want to see education flourish but, whatever we say, we don’t seem to get anywhere. I think we’re at a brick wall now.”
She added: “With the industrial action with the lecturers, we completely agree with it. But, at the same time, our education is being impacted and, unless there’s a change in funding, nothing’s going to happen so, you agree and you support it but, on the other hand... students are not having their assessments marked and, therefore, they’re having issues with progression. So, they become angry at the wrong people because of that. The problem is the funding – that’s the problem.”
READ MORE: Dundee high schools face fresh strike threat
Drawing attention to relatively peaceful relations between student associations and college bosses, Ross Greer of the Scottish Greens asked: “Is there any bearing on that from the fact that your relationship with management also involves the funding that student associations receive from colleges? Do you ever feel that the financial relationship compromises your ability to perhaps be a bit tougher in that relationship and a bit more combative?” Ms Koss said: “Absolutely – it would be really, really difficult for us to flat out, publicly disagree with the college whereas the Educational Institute of Scotland Further Education Lecturers’ Association (EIS-FELA) can just go out there and say, ‘we don’t agree with this’.”
Heather Innes, vice-president for higher education and president elect at the Highlands and Islands Students’ Association, told MSPs that a less adversarial approach was often more productive.
She said: “There definitely is still an anger there, but I’ve found that being diplomatic often yields better results.
"We have a really good relationship with the regional team at the University of the Highlands and Islands and, often, sitting down and having those discussions behind closed doors yields better results than standing up against them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here