A territorial dispute between Denmark and Canada over a barren and uninhabited rock in the Arctic that has led to decades of friendly friction has come to an end, with the two countries agreeing to divide the tiny island between them.
Under the agreement, a border will be drawn across the half-square-mile Hans Island, in the waterway between the north-western coast of the semi-autonomous Danish territory of Greenland and Canada's Ellesmere Island.
The rock has no mineral reserves.
"It sends a clear signal that it is possible to resolve border disputes... in a pragmatic and peaceful way, where the all parties become winners," said Danish foreign minister Jeppe Kofod.
He said it was "an important signal now that there is much war and unrest in the world".
Canada and Denmark agreed in 1973 to create a border through the Nares Strait, halfway between Greenland and Canada, but they were unable to agree which country would have sovereignty over Hans Island, about 684 miles south of the North Pole.
In the end, they decided to work out the question of ownership later.
In the following years, the territorial dispute - nicknamed the "whisky war" by media - raised its head multiple times.
In 1984, Denmark's minister of Greenland affairs raised a Danish flag on the island, buried a bottle of Danish schnapps at the base of the flagpole and left a note saying: "Welcome to the Danish island."
Canadians then planted their own flag and left a bottle of Canadian brandy.
Since then, the countries have in turns hoisted their flags and left bottles of various spirits in tit-for-tat moves.
In 2002, Nana Flensburg was part of a Danish military crew that stood on the cliff to perform a flag-raising ceremony.
The Politiken newspaper on Tuesday quoted her as saying in her diary that "among the stones in the cairns were lots of bottles, glasses, etc, with documents that informed about previous visits to the island."
The agreement comes into force after the two countries' internal procedures have been completed. In Denmark, the parliament must first give its consent to the agreement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here