Scotland’s school qualifications system has gone backwards during the last decade, according to a union boss.
Delivering his final address to the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) AGM, general secretary Larry Flanagan said there was too much emphasis on "high-stakes exams". He also stressed that he believed strongly in the staff empowerment agenda.
“It’s about teacher agency, professional autonomy,” he told delegates gathered in Dundee's Caird Hall. “This is not an uncontested area in practice because, for teachers to be empowered, others have to give up power and those others include the Scottish Government, local authorities, educational agencies and even school management teams where collegiality is not the norm.”
Mr Flanagan said he was particularly concerned about exams and pupil assessment. “It’s not been a progressive decade,” he added. “Frankly we are in a poorer position today than we were ten years ago.
“We have a high-stakes exam system, a three-year treadmill... which the pandemic exposed as inherently inequitable. But we also have demonstrable evidence from the pandemic that pupils and parents trust teacher judgements. That should be the starting point for the review being led by [Professor] Louise Hayward.”
Mr Flanagan continued: “Andy Hargreaves and Dennis Shirley in their latest book, Five Paths of Student Engagement, reference the challenges of the pandemic but also highlight the importance of analysing carefully lessons to be learned from what they describe as an accidental, real-time social experiment.
“The key lesson, I believe, is the absolutely critical role of the teacher and the teacher pupil interaction to the nurturing of wellbeing among children and as the basis of all successful learning. It may seem an obvious lesson for us but there are too many policy makers, far removed from school practice, who pay little more than lip service to this.”
Mr Flanagan later went on to say: “Politicians need to stop their constant bickering and lend Scotland’s teachers their full support.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel