IF RECENT media coverage is anything to go by, I must have been unusually lucky on the flight I took to London on Wednesday last week. From the front door at Glasgow Airport to the end of the security process took about 20 minutes. I had heeded the Airport’s advice not to turn up excessively early but I had been mentally prepared for a long and stressful queue. There was none.
There was an incident last Monday that kicked off the story that Glasgow Airport was under severe pressure and some reporting even went as far as to suggest travellers would be better looking elsewhere to plan their journeys. Glasgow Airport’s recovery is essential for the long-term health of Glasgow’s economy so I checked with the airport team whether I had indeed been fortunate.
The average waiting time through security is currently 15 minutes which is certainly up from the 10 minutes before the pandemic but hardly justification for avoiding the airport. Even at its worst last Monday it was just under 40 minutes and nobody missed their flight.
The stories emerging from airports in other parts of the UK have been more alarming with frequent – and occasionally last-minute – cancellations, very extensive queuing and missed flights. Airports and airlines have been getting it in the neck for being under-prepared for the resurgence in travel demand. I suspect that if I were to be the victim of a similar experience I would have no hesitation joining the clamour.
UK Secretary of State for Transport Grant Shapps certainly couldn’t resist accusing the aviation industry of cutting too deeply during the pandemic and demanding that ‘the airlines, the travel industry, need to make sure it’s sorted out’. Customers having a go at the industry for cancelling flights is fair enough but I draw the line at senior politicians. How quickly they forget.
It was only on March 18th that the UK government finally lifted the last of the Covid-19 travel restrictions and with plenty of reluctance expressed by the Scottish Government as case numbers at the time were still considered too high. That is not even three months for an industry that would normally be planning its summer resources during the previous winter. Mr Shapps appears a little too keen to join the chorus of criticism, ignoring the extent of the damage that two years of restrictions has caused to an industry that was at the very forefront of pandemic impact.
One can certainly debate the wisdom of responding to demand by planning flights that were dependent on optimistic staffing forecasts but accusing the industry of ‘cutting too deep’ when it was all but closed for months on end and with no means of estimating the future is harsh.
Support for Glasgow Airport’s recovery is one of the priorities agreed by Glasgow Chamber of Commerce’s governing body and there are good reasons for that. The EY 2022 report on Scotland’s investment attractiveness was a cheering reminder that Scotland has been a strong inward investment performer both in terms of projects secured and – more importantly – in jobs announced. Both Edinburgh and Glasgow were in the top five city destinations.
Dig into the detail and you find that the United States provided by far the largest number of projects. That is not terribly surprising in Glasgow when you consider the significance of companies such as JP Morgan or Morgan Stanley in financial services or Thermo Fisher in the health and life sciences. That is why it is so concerning for the longer term supply of inward investment to Glasgow that there is currently no direct flight from Glasgow Airport to the United States.
It would be better if senior politicians put as much effort into helping our regional airports recover their routes as they have into criticising the industry’s shortcomings.
Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here