DOMINIC Raab has played down Conservative chances in the two byelections seen as the next flashpoint in Boris Johnson’s rolling leadership crisis.
But the deputy Prime Minister insisted any losses caused by “protest votes” in Wakefield and Tiverton & Honiton on June 23 would have little effect on a general election result.
Speaking on LBC Radio, Mr Raab said: “By-elections are often an opportunity for a protest vote in a way that a general election isn’t.
“Governments of the day often lose by-elections to go on to win them at a general election.
“But we’ll do everything we can to win both of those seats and support both of those great candidates up there.”
However critics of Mr Johnson, who failed to oust him in a 211-148 confidence vote of MPs on Monday, have warned the contests could be critical to the PM’s future.
Both triggered by Tory MPs resigning in disgrace, the byelections are seen as tests of Mr Johnson’s popularity in the north and south of England, and measures of Labour and Liberal Democrat strength.
Wakefield, a red wall seat in West Yorkshire, had been Labour-held since 1932 until it was won for the Conservatives by Imran Ahmad Khan in 2019 with a majority of 3,358.
He resigned after being convicted in April of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old boy in 2008.
Polls suggest Labour now has a 20-point lead over the Tories in the seat, and will regain it with ease later this month.
Tiverton & Honiton in Devon has been Tory-held since it was created in 1997, with Neil Parish holding it with a majority of 24,239 over Labour at the last general election.
However in April he announced he was resigning after looking at porn in the Commons chamber and in a committee and claiming he’d been searching for material on tractors.
Despite coming third in 2019, the LibDems believe they can win the seat, helped by a tacit agreement with Labour that gives them a virtually clear run at it.
Mr Johnson today told his cabinet his win on Monday, despite 41 per cent of MPs wanting rid of him, would allow him to “draw a line” under recent distractions and move on.
However if the Tories lose both seats it will fuel worries in the party that Mr Johnson is no longer the electoral asset he was just three years ago, and a pincer movement by Labour in the north and the LibDems in the south could squeeze the party out of power in 2024.
Under the current rules of the backbench 1922 committee, Mr Johnson cannot face another confidence vote within 12 months.
However rebels have already highlighted that the rules could be changed to allow another vote far sooner, possibly before the Tory conference in the autumn.
Even if Mr Johnson gets through the byelections unscathed, he also faces an investigation by the Commons privileges committee into whether he misled parliament over Partygate.
Despite attending a series of leaving dos for staff and the birthday party which led to him being fined by the police, Mr Johnson told MPs there had been no parties or law-breaking in Number 10 while strict pandemic lockdown rules were in force.
Former Tory minister David Gauke said the committee, which is due to report in Ocotber, was the "the big issue" for the PM and could lead to a rule change on confidence votes.
"I really don’t believe even this Conservative Party will be able to tolerate someone who's been found to have misled the House of Commons," he said.
He said MPs will have to decide if they think the PM is still a vote-winner, and "the evidence is increasingly there that the British public have lost confidence in Boris Johnson".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel