JACOB REES-Mogg has said Boris Johnson can stay in office if he wins by a single vote tonight despite previously demanding Theresa May quit after she won by 83.
The Brexit opportunities minister said a winning margin one in the confidence vote by Tory MPs would be “enough” for the Prime Minister to have a mandate to stay in Number 10.
However in December 2019, after Mrs May won a confidence vote by 200 to 117, Mr Rees-Mogg said it was a “terrible result” for her and she should quit.
A vocal Brexiteer critic of Mrs May, he said at the time: “It's a terrible result for the Prime Minister, it really is.
"Of course I accept this result. But the Prime Minister must realise that under all constitutional norms, she ought to go and see the Queen urgently and resign.”
Today, Mr Rees-Mogg suggested a very different sort of arithmetic applied to Mr Johnson.
He said: “One is enough. That’s the rule in a democracy – if you win by one you win.”
Pressed on the matter during a Sky News interview, he said: “One is enough, it’s no good saying that the rules of the party say something and then behind it unofficially, there is some other rule that nobody knows and is invented for the purpose.
“I obviously want the Prime Minister to get as big a majority as possible, I think that would be helpful and it would close this matter down between now and the next general election, which would be good for the country, good for the Conservative Party, but one is enough.”
Asked to be clear if he meant Mr Johnson would have a “clear mandate” to rule if he won by such a small majority, Mr Rees-Mogg said: “To be absolutely clear, the answer is yes.”
He said the Conservative Party wrote the rules for a “straight up and down vote”.
Mr Rees-Mogg also claimed that people booing the PM outside St Paul’s Cathedral during the Jubilee weekend was a “mere bagatelle” and “perfectly normal”.
Pressed by host Kay Burley over the PM being jeered during such a significant national event, he said: “I think you over-interpret what happened. Political figures must expect this.
“Politicians who do things, politicians who achieve things, politicians who lead the country well, obviously stir up strong emotions in certain sections of the population.
“That is what you would expect and I think that the sort of piety that they were on the steps of St Paul’s is not really reflective of modern British society.”
After being played a clip of the incident, he accused Sky News of turning up the volume.
He said: “Turning the volume up to get your readers to be too concerned about that – that was a bit miserable really.”
MP Peter Bone, another of Mrs May’s Brexiteer critics and supporter of Mr Johnson, also said in 2019 that winning a confidence vote in itself was not enough to stay on.
He said at the time: “She said in 2017 she would lead the Conservative Party if she had the support of the parliamentary party. Clearly when you've got more than a third voting against you don't. So if she honours her word she will decide in the interests of the party and the nation she will go."
He added: "How can she govern when she doesn't have a third of the party supporting her?"
After winning her confidence vote, Mrs May struggled to regain authority and quit six months later when the Tories came a humiliating fifth in the 2019 Euro elections.
Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis also said winning the vote “is victory” even if by a single vote.
“We live in a democracy and it’s absolutely right that a democratic decision is what we respect,” he said.
Attorney General Suella Braverman said “technically, yes” a single vote win would be enough for Mr Johnson to continue but “I’m sure that he will win with a larger margin than that”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel