DOUGLAS Ross was carpeted by the Presiding Officer during a rowdy session of First Minister’s Questions for referring to the deputy First Minister as “Honest John”.
Alison Johnstone told the Scottish Tory leader to “desist from nicknames.”
John Swinney was standing in for Nicola Sturgeon during the regular Thursday questions after the First Minister pulled out after being "floored" by the Coronavirus.
The use of the unparliamentary moniker came as Mr Ross quizzed the SNP veteran on his role in signing off a controversial deal for two new Calmac ferries.
The cost of the new vessels being built to serve Scotland’s island communities has soared from £97 million to at least £250 million and they are now four years overdue.
The Scottish Government has come under pressure to explain why it effectively overruled CalMac to push ahead and award the contract to Ferguson Marine despite normal financial safeguards not being in place, including the guarantee of a full refund if something goes wrong.
Emails released by the government show that while the then Transport Minister Derek Mackay signed it off, Mr Swinney was briefed on the decision making process, and "cleared the proposal."
It’s not the first time the Scottish Tory leader has branded Mr Swinney, “Honest John” over the ferry row.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross accused of 'nasty politics' over attack on John Swinney
Last month, during another exchange, Mr Ross claimed “Honest John’s hands are all over this dodgy deal."
At the time the Presiding Officer did not intervene.
However, in 2015, when it was used about Mr Swinney during a debate by the then Labour MSP Neil Findlay, the deputy presiding officer at the time, chided the member.
While there is not a list of words or phrases that are not allowed in the chamber, there are certain words that the presiding officers consider to be unparliamentary by their very nature.
In today's session, Ms Johnstone cut in on Mr Ross to say: “We will desist from nicknames in this Chamber and we will call people by their first names.”
“Sorry, sorry,” he replied.
During the exchange, Mr Ross pointed to emails which he said showed Swinney had approved the contract. He told MSPs: "Against overwhelming evidence, John Swinney signed off the deal anyway.
"It seems obvious to everyone what has happened here. The SNP wanted the political praise for keeping the yard open ahead of an election, so they ignored all the alarm bells.
"It looks an awful lot like the SNP made a dodgy deal and now they’re covering it up.
"Can the deputy First Minister really tell the public that there was no political motive behind the award of this contract?"
Replying to Mr Ross, the deputy First Minister said: “There was no political motive behind this contract.
“The objective of the Government was to ensure that ferries that are required are built and that is what we are concentrating on achieving. And we are also determined to ensure that employment in the lower Clyde is supported with contracts coming from the Calmac network.
“For Mr Ross to say that somehow the yard could stay open without any contracts is just to deny physical reality about the way which a yard would be run.”
He insisted that “Audit Scotland had deemed the procurement process to be “entirely standard”, adding: “And on that basis the transport minister took the decision to award the contract.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel