Rishi Sunak has been urged to slap a windfall tax on "polluters who are harming our environment" and not on green energy producers.
It comes as reports suggest the Chancellor could soon impose an emergency levy on all electricity generators, including wind farms, not just oil and gas giants.
The news that Treasury officials were investigating a possible windfall tax on more than £10bn of excess profits to help with the UK’s cost of living crisis saw shares in British power firms plummet.
Drax, Centrica and SSE were down between 11 and 19 per cent, heading for their worst day since the start of the pandemic.
The plan to target all electricity generators goes far beyond Labour’s call for a one-off levy on North Sea oil and gas producers.
According to the paper, a government insider said "North Sea oil and gas producers are only half the picture. The other half is that high gas prices have led to some pretty substantial windfall profits for all electricity generation."
A spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said the UK Government needed to focus on oil and gas firms.
"What we need is a rapid expansion of investment in renewable energy. A windfall tax should fall on the polluters who are harming our environment and hitting households with skyrocketing bills," they said.
Reports suggest there is a disagreement, with the Prime Minister sceptical of the tax.
Mr Johnson said on Monday that “no option is off the table” but added: “I’m not attracted, intrinsically, to new taxes.”
He told broadcasters: “As I have said throughout, we have got to do what we can, and we will, to look after people through the aftershocks of Covid, through the current pressures on energy prices that we are seeing post-Covid and with what’s going on in Russia and we are going to put our arms round people, just as we did during the pandemic.”
He said there was “more that we are going to do” but “you’ll just have to wait a little bit longer”.
Mr Sunak has expressed reluctance about backing a windfall tax, but he has acknowledged the need to be “pragmatic”.
Meanwhile, UK companies servicing oil and gas operators have urged the Prime Minister and the Chancellor against enforcing a windfall tax, in an open letter.
In the letter, issued on Tuesday by trade body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK), which represents more than 400 companies in the sector, signatories warn that the industry is only in the early days of a recovery, after suffering significant losses in recent downturns.
The letter says: “A one-off windfall tax on energy producers will not sustainably help consumers and will only further reduce investor confidence in the UK, the ripple effect of which we will feel for many years to come.
“And it will do nothing to address the cyclical nature of an energy system linked to global supply and demand, with the UK becoming much less attractive to investors who will look elsewhere for the long-term stability they require to progress major energy projects.”
It went on to say any “surprise windfall tax” risks operators – big and small – scaling back their investment plans in response, which could have an impact on jobs.
The letter says: “The ramifications of any halt in investment will be felt throughout the supply chain, through jobs, and the communities this industry supports, both directly and indirectly.
“For the tens of thousands of jobs this industry supports, the impact of a windfall tax will be even greater in the long term.
“This is not least because it follows a downturn felt especially hard by the supply chain side of the industry, with thousands of manufacturing roles lost up and down the country.”
OEUK chief executive Deirdre Michie added: “After significant downturns which saw the offshore energy industry lose thousands of jobs, we need to encourage investment in cleaner energies and the sector which supports it.
“This industry is committed to supporting the country’s energy security, economy and net zero ambitions – now is the time for us to work together to drive action.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel