LEADING businessmen Lord Willie Haughey and Sir Tom Hunter have warned that ramifications of scrapping the Northern Ireland Protocol could be “felt for decades”.
The protocol, agreed with the European Union in 2019 as part of the UK’s Brexit deal, has caused tensions since it came into force at the start of last year.
Now the UK Government wants to make changes to the post-Brexit border rules in Northern Ireland with UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss saying a new law would be introduced.
Lord Haughey said: “When you get involved in an international treaty, which is what this is, then you want to go against what you have signed, and you’ve shaken hands with people, then I think your standing as a world power is diminished.
“I think the ramifications of what’s going on here could be felt for years and years, for decades to come.”
Conceding that there must be “give and take” in any negotiations, Sir Tom added: “I’ve dealt with tough negotiators in my time but when you shake their hand the deal is done and that is it.
“I don’t think anybody can really trust the UK now because when you shake Boris Johnson’s hand you don’t know what that means – and that is a bad situation for the UK to be in.”
Sir Tom pointed out that the people of Northern Ireland, where special arrangements were needed after Brexit as it is the only part of the UK with a land border with an EU country – the Republic of Ireland – should not be disadvantaged.
Meanwhile, Lord Haughey alluded to the fact that some senior Conservative backbenchers had stated that the UK would be “morally corrupt” to go against the Northern Ireland Protocol, an agreement it has already signed up to.
Before Brexit, goods could be easily moved across the border as both Northern Ireland the Republic of Ireland followed the same EU trade rules and no checks or paperwork were required.
After Brexit, a new system was necessary because the EU’s strict food rules require border checks for certain goods, such as eggs and milk, arriving from non-EU countries.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel