Sweden on Tuesday signed a formal request to join Nato, a day after the country announced it would seek membership in the 30-member military alliance.
In neighbouring Finland, lawmakers are expected later in the day to formally endorse Finnish leaders' decision also to join.
The moves by the two Nordic countries, ending Sweden's more than 200 years of military nonalignment and Finland's nonalignment after the Second World War, have provoked the ire of the Kremlin.
While most Nato members are keen to welcome the two countries as quickly as possible, Turkey has potentially complicated their accession by saying it cannot allow them to become members because of their perceived inaction against exiled Kurdish militants.
Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Monday doubled down on comments last week indicating that the two Nordic countries' path to NATO would be anything but smooth.
All 30 current Nato countries must agree to open the door to new members. He accused the two Nordic countries of refusing to extradite "terrorists" wanted by his country.
In Stockholm, Swedish foreign minister Ann Linde signed the formal request to join the Alliance, which she said would be sent to Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg.
"It feels like we have taken a decision that is the best for Sweden," she said while signing the document.
Finnish president Sauli Niinisto arrived in Sweden for an official visit and was welcomed by Sweden's King Carl XVI Gustaf and Queen Silvia, who had invited him.
Niinisto is scheduled to address Sweden's Parliament in a speech expected to focus on Nato, and meet Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson.
On Twitter, Niinisto said that "the timing is excellent, a strong and stable Nordic region is our common cause".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here