NICOLA Sturgeon has urged Americans not to re-elect Donald Trump “at any point”.
The First Minister said the former President was the type of populist “strongman” who threatened the planet by not taking action against climate change.
In contrast, she described President Joe Biden’s administration as visibly and tangibly “constructive” on climate change.
President Trump, who has hinted at standing for re-election in 2024, was a vocal supporter of fossil fuel extraction in the US, including oil drilling, coal mining and fracking.
Ms Sturgeon, who supported Hillary Clinton when she ran against Mr Trump in 2016, made the comments on the first leg of a two-day visit to the United States.
In a Q&A after a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington DC about “Scotland and the future of European energy security”, she was asked which policies the United States can adopt to better assist European energy security.
Ms Sturgeon replied: “Don’t re-elect Trump at any point.”
She said that was “too light hearted an answer” but then heaped praise on the attitude of President Biden’s administration at last year’s COP26 Climate conference in Glasgow.
She said: “It was visible and tangible, the difference that constructive American leadership made to getting the outcome that we achieved in Glasgow.
“It wasn't everything everybody wanted to see, but it was positive, and the US government, [US climate envoy] John Kerry in particular, played a vital role in that.
“So continue to be that leader [in] these global conversations that we really need the United States to be would be my first plea.
“And then, you know, be part of the discussions as the United States says, about how we make these transitions.
“I think there is a lot to learn in both directions from how we don't repeat the mistakes of the past and other economic upheavals and transitions.
“So there's lots we can learn from each other, but keeping the United States in that position of constructive leadership, I think, is one of the key things that I would certainly like to see.”
She also said an independent Scotland's membership of Nato would be a "cornerstone" of the country's security policy, even though her current Green partners in government oppose Nato membership.
She said: "I am firm in my view that - coupled with a strong relationship with the UK - membership of the EU and of NATO will be cornerstones of an independent Scotland’s security policy.
"The Scottish Government is acutely aware of Scotland’s strategic position on the northern edge of Europe, close to the Arctic.
"Russian military aircraft regularly approach the UK’s area of interest, and in recent years there has been an increase in Russian submarine patrols within the North Atlantic.
"And so we are clearer than ever that membership of NATO would not only be vital to Scotland’s security - though it most definitely would be - it would also be the principal way in which an independent Scotland, in an interdependent world, would contribute to the collective security of our neighbours and allies."
Earlier in her speech, Ms Sturgeon stressed the importance of helping communities reliant on jobs in the fossil fuel industry make the transition to the renewable energy sector.
She said that if the change was mishandled, it could scar communities and lead to angry voters turning to populist politicians who could exacerbate the climate crisis.
She said: “Certainly, one of the reasons for the wave of populism we’ve seen in many countries in the developed world - including the UK and the USA - is the sense that people have been left behind, that they’ve been ignored and disregarded by their governments.
“That sense has its roots in the economic changes of the 1980s, and it was undoubtedly compounded by the impacts of the 2008 financial crash.
“So if the move to net zero turns out to be yet another economic upheaval that is done to people and communities rather than done with and for them; if people don’t have the chance to influence the changes they see in their lives; and if they cannot see and feel any benefit from those changes; then there is a real danger that communities will feel abandoned again, that faith in politics will be further undermined, and more countries will become susceptible to the populism of strongmen leaders.
“That would be disastrous for our environment, detrimental for our, in some places, already fragile democracies, and deeply dangerous for our national and international security.”
Ms Sturgeon also said Scotland could use its off-shore wind power to generate hydrogen and to become the most reliable and cheapest producer of green hydrogen in Europe.
She said Scotland had the capacity to create 5GW of hydrogen by 2030, or a seventh of current total energy demand, but 25GW by 2045, allowing it to export most of it.
Tory MSP Donald Cameron said Ms Sturgeon "betrayed her naivety, and the SNP’s weakness, on international security" in the speech.
“She was keen to talk up how an independent Scotland would help the collective security of the West, yet conveniently forgot to mention that her party is committed to removing the UK’s nuclear deterrent.
“She also failed to address how her mission to break up the UK would help western security because, as she well knows, that’s something the UK’s enemies would relish.
“And then there’s the biggest elephant in the room: the fact that her self-serving push for another divisive independence referendum is opposed by the majority of Scots.
“They want the First Minister to focus on the cost-of-living crisis and sorting out her government’s failures on health, education, drugs deaths and the ferries fiasco, rather than gallivanting across the Atlantic selling half-baked plans for separation.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel